UpCloud vs VirMach
A detailed comparison to help you choose between UpCloud and VirMach.
UpCloud MaxIOPS storage tops disk benchmarks consistently | VirMach Ultra-budget US VPS with many locations | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (367 reviews)✓ | 4.3 (134 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €7/mo | From €1/mo✓ |
| Best for | Database-heavy applications in Europe where disk I/O performance is the primary bottleneck | Students and hobbyists who need the cheapest possible VPS to learn Linux and server management |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | 4,600 | — |
| Disk read (fio) | 2,800 MB/s | — |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | 62,000 | — |
| Network out | 1 Gbps | — |
| Latency (TTFB) | 22 ms | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacentergdpr compliantapi accessprivate networking | nvme storageipv6us datacenterwindows available |
| Visit UpCloud → | Visit VirMach → | |
UpCloud
Pros
- + MaxIOPS storage ranks #1 in disk benchmarks
- + 100% uptime SLA — they compensate
- + Strong European datacenter coverage including Helsinki and Warsaw
Cons
- - More expensive than Hetzner for equivalent specs
- - Fewer locations than Vultr
VirMach
Pros
- + Ultra-low prices — some plans under $1/month
- + Many US datacenter options
- + Good for learning and testing
Cons
- - Performance very inconsistent
- - Annual billing required on budget plans
- - Support can be slow
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.