Statuspage vs SigNoz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Statuspage and SigNoz.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Statuspage
0 reviews
4.0/5
SigNoz
0 reviews
SigNoz is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). Atlassian's hosted status page platform: component-based status, subscriber notifications (email/Slack/Teams free; SMS/webhook paid), scheduled maintenance, Jira and Opsgenie integration. Public, private, and audience-specific pages. SigNoz is a full-stack open source observability platform — metrics, traces, and logs in one. Datadog alternative you can self-host. Uses ClickHouse for efficient storage.
Statuspage Incident communication from Atlassian | SigNoz Open-source observability platform for logs, metrics, and traces | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | SaaS and infrastructure teams that want a credible, component-level public status page with subscriber notifications, especially when already using Jira or Opsgenie. | Engineering teams priced out of Datadog or New Relic that want OpenTelemetry-native logs, metrics and traces with computable usage-based costs and US/EU/India data residency. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United States, European Union, India (SigNoz Cloud regions) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accessteam features | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Statuspage → | Visit SigNoz → | |
Statuspage
Pros
- + The recognized standard — the status page most users already know how to read
- + Genuinely usable free plan: 100 subscribers, 25 components, API included
- + Component subscriptions let users follow only the services they use
- + Deep Atlassian integrations: Jira, Opsgenie, Slack, Microsoft Teams
- + Three page types (public, private, audience-specific) cover customer and internal comms
Cons
- - SMS and webhook notifications gated behind the $99/mo Startup plan
- - Component subscriptions and full HTML/JS customization need the $399/mo Business plan
- - Enterprise pricing (from $1,499/mo) is steep versus newer status-page rivals
- - SSO costs extra via Atlassian Guard; Atlassian account sprawl adds friction
- - Plan-name and subscriber-count details differ between Atlassian's own pricing page and buyer's guide
SigNoz
Pros
- + Usage-based pricing with published per-unit rates ($0.30/GB logs and traces, $0.10/mn metric samples) and no per-user or per-host billing
- + OpenTelemetry-native: no proprietary SDKs, so instrumentation does not lock you in
- + Logs, metrics, traces, APM, exceptions and alerts correlated in one ClickHouse-backed product
- + Self-hostable open-source community edition plus cloud regions in the US, EU and India with SOC2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
- + Worked pricing examples and a bill calculator published — costs are computable before you commit
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier (from $4,000/month)
- - Self-hosted community edition makes storage, scaling, upgrades and backups your operational problem
- - Usage bills move with retention choices and noisy telemetry; the $49 entry tier shows a struck-through $199 base price
- - Narrower turnkey integration ecosystem than Datadog; RBAC is beta and audit logs/multi-tenancy are roadmap items
- - Migration tooling and dedicated Slack support are gated at spends above $999/month
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.