Skip to content
Statuspage logo

Statuspage

Incident communication from Atlassian

3.9(0 reviews)freemiumFounded 2013United States
free tierapi accessteam features

Atlassian's hosted status page platform: component-based status, subscriber notifications (email/Slack/Teams free; SMS/webhook paid), scheduled maintenance, Jira and Opsgenie integration. Public, private, and audience-specific pages.

What Statuspage actually is

Statuspage is the product most people picture when they hear "status page". If you have clicked through an outage banner at Dropbox, Reddit, or Intercom, you have probably used it. It is a hosted incident-communication platform: you model your services as components, post incidents and scheduled maintenance against them, and your users subscribe to notifications by email, SMS, Slack, Microsoft Teams, or webhook. Behind the subscriber-facing page sits an incident dashboard, per-component status history, and metrics widgets fed from your monitoring.

The company behind it dates to the Y Combinator Summer 2013 batch. StatusPage (as it was styled) was built by Steve Klein, Scott Klein, and Danny Olinsky, launched publicly in July 2013 with paying customers like Shopify, New Relic, and Zendesk already on the books, and was acquired by Atlassian on July 14, 2016. It has run as a standalone Atlassian product since, on the statuspage.io domain, with the integrations you would expect from that family: Jira for issue creation, Opsgenie for on-call and alerting, Slack and Microsoft Teams for notifications, plus a REST API on every plan including the free one.

The product ships three page types, and the distinction is the main thing to understand before pricing it. Public pages are the classic anyone-can-view status page. Private pages require login and are aimed at internal stakeholder communication. Audience-specific pages give different user groups filtered views of the same page — useful when your customers sit on separate shards or tenants and each should see only their own status. Each type has its own plan ladder, which is where the pricing gets dense.

Pricing: what you really pay

There is a real free plan, not just a trial: 100 subscribers, 25 components, two team members, two metrics widgets, email plus Slack plus Microsoft Teams notifications, and REST API access. For a small SaaS product that wants a credible public status page today, that is enough to run for years, and we respect that the free tier includes the API instead of locking it behind a paywall.

Above free, public pages run on four tiers. The Hobby plan is $29/mo for 250 subscribers, five team members, and five metrics — email notifications only, no CSS/HTML/JavaScript customization beyond colors. The Startup plan is $99/mo and is where the product becomes genuinely usable for a growing company: 1,000 subscribers, 10 team members, 10 metrics, SMS and webhook notifications, and custom CSS. The Business plan is $399/mo for 5,000 subscribers, 25 team members, full CSS/HTML/JavaScript control, and component subscriptions — the feature that lets subscribers opt into only the services they care about. The Enterprise plan starts at $1,499/mo and up, with 50 team members and higher subscriber ceilings (the public pricing page currently shows a 25,000-subscriber tier).

Private pages have their own ladder: Starter at $79/mo (50 page users, email only), Growth at $249/mo (300 page users, 15 team members, email/SMS/webhook), Corporate at $599/mo (1,000 page users, 35 team members, invoice/PO billing), and Enterprise at $1,499/mo (5,000 page viewers, 50 team members). Audience-specific pages are priced in packs of 10 groups and 500 users.

Our honest read of these numbers: the entry points are fair and the ceilings are steep. Paying $99/mo before you can send an SMS or a webhook notification is the tier gate that annoys us most — notification fan-out is table stakes for incident comms, and competitors give it away cheaper. Equally, $399/mo to get component subscriptions is a lot for one feature, however good it is. SSL does not cost extra, and single sign-on runs through Atlassian Guard, which is a separate Atlassian charge — factor that into any enterprise comparison.

Performance & infrastructure

As a hosted SaaS, Statuspage does not sell compute, so there are no cores or gigabytes to compare here; what matters is the delivery and notification machinery. Pages are served from Atlassian's cloud infrastructure with custom domains and included SSL. Notification fan-out goes out over email on every paid tier, with SMS and webhooks from the Startup tier up, and Slack and Microsoft Teams on the free plan as well. The metrics widgets (two free, up to 50 at the top tier) display data pushed from your own monitoring through the API.

The reliability story is the strongest part of the pitch. Status pages only pay for themselves if they are up when you are down, and Statuspage's infrastructure has carried the public status pages of very large internet properties for a decade. The company's own example set — status.dropbox.com, redditstatus.com, intercomstatus.com — is a reasonable proxy for the load levels it handles. We have no independent measurements to offer: this is an incident-communication tool, not a server or CDN, and our benchmark suite (see benchmarks) does not apply. What we can say is that the product's track record in the one scenario that matters — your outage, their page — is about as proven as this category gets.

The API and integrations are the other infrastructure consideration. The REST API covers incidents, components, subscribers, and metrics and is available on every plan, which means you can automate incident creation straight from your alerting pipeline. Jira and Opsgenie integrations are documented at the Atlassian support site and are the reason many teams pick Statuspage over a standalone rival: one outage becomes a Jira ticket, an Opsgenie incident, and a published status update without three manual re-entries.

Where it falls short

Price discipline. From the Startup tier up, Statuspage costs meaningfully more than the current generation of status-page tools — Instatus, Better Uptime, Statuspal and others sell comparable public pages with SMS and webhooks at a fraction of $99/mo, and open-source options like Cachet exist if you would rather host it yourself. We like the product; we do not like paying enterprise prices for notification features that are standard elsewhere.

Feature gating is aggressive even by SaaS standards. Custom CSS starts at $99/mo, HTML/JavaScript at $399/mo. Component subscriptions — the single best notification feature in the product — are Business-tier only. Private pages cannot send SMS or webhooks below $249/mo. If your use case sits just above a tier boundary, the step-up costs real money for one feature.

Then there is Atlassian itself. The upside of the acquisition is integration and corporate stability; the downside is everything people mean when they say "Atlassian complexity" — account management through the Atlassian ecosystem, SSO priced through Atlassian Guard, and the general experience of being a small line item in a very large vendor's portfolio. Support quality tracks your plan tier, as with everything Atlassian sells. There is also product-strategy drift worth watching: Atlassian has been consolidating its incident tooling around Jira Service Management and Compass, and while Statuspage remains actively sold, buyers should ask direct questions about the long-term roadmap before signing a multi-year Enterprise agreement.

One small honesty note: we have seen the plan-name ladder and subscriber counts differ slightly between the public pricing page and Atlassian's own buyer's guide (the guide describes Enterprise public pages as 5,000 subscribers; the pricing page shows 25,000). The prices above come from Atlassian's buyer's guide; treat the exact subscriber ceilings as moving parts and confirm on the pricing page at purchase time.

Who should pick this

Our pick when the audience is your customers and credibility matters. If you run a SaaS product and your users expect a professional, component-level status page with subscriber notifications, Statuspage is the safe, recognized choice — it is the default for a reason, and "we use Statuspage" is a sentence your enterprise buyers already understand. Teams already deep in Jira and Opsgenie get extra value from the integration path, and that is where we would start any shortlist in our monitoring and hosting category.

We would skip it for hobby projects and bootstrapped products unless the free plan covers you — at 100 subscribers and email/Slack/Teams notifications, the free tier genuinely might. And we would look elsewhere when cost is the binding constraint: a small team that needs SMS alerts and a custom domain for under the price of the Startup tier has credible options now that did not exist when Statuspage defined the category.

Key takeaways

  • Statuspage (Atlassian, acquired July 2016 from the YC Summer 2013 startup StatusPage) is the established standard for hosted incident communication: components, incidents, maintenance windows, and subscriber notifications.
  • The free plan is real — 100 subscribers, 25 components, two team members, email/Slack/Teams notifications, REST API — and enough for small products.
  • Paid public pages run $29 / $99 / $399 per month up to an Enterprise tier from $1,499/mo; private pages start at $79/mo.
  • Our main gripe is tier gating: SMS and webhooks need the $99/mo Startup plan, component subscriptions need the $399/mo Business plan.
  • Jira, Opsgenie, Slack, and Teams integrations plus an API on every plan make it the natural pick inside the Atlassian ecosystem.
  • For cost-sensitive teams, newer rivals (Instatus, Better Uptime and similar) cover the same ground for less; Statuspage earns its price where brand credibility and Atlassian integration matter.

Sources

Pros

  • The recognized standard — the status page most users already know how to read
  • Genuinely usable free plan: 100 subscribers, 25 components, API included
  • Component subscriptions let users follow only the services they use
  • Deep Atlassian integrations: Jira, Opsgenie, Slack, Microsoft Teams
  • Three page types (public, private, audience-specific) cover customer and internal comms

Cons

  • SMS and webhook notifications gated behind the $99/mo Startup plan
  • Component subscriptions and full HTML/JS customization need the $399/mo Business plan
  • Enterprise pricing (from $1,499/mo) is steep versus newer status-page rivals
  • SSO costs extra via Atlassian Guard; Atlassian account sprawl adds friction
  • Plan-name and subscriber-count details differ between Atlassian's own pricing page and buyer's guide

Best For

SaaS and infrastructure teams that want a credible, component-level public status page with subscriber notifications, especially when already using Jira or Opsgenie.

Pricing

Free

Free
  • Core features included

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Sign in to leave a review.

Sign In →

Articles about Statuspage

Alternatives to Statuspage

H

HetrixTools

Server monitoring with blacklist checking

Server MonitoringFree tier
4.3 ()
View Tool →
B

Better Stack (Logtail)

Real-time log management and server monitoring for development teams

Server MonitoringFree tier
4.2 ()
View Tool →
O

Oh Dear

Website monitoring with SSL and broken link checks

Server MonitoringFrom $15/mo
4.2 ()
View Tool →
P

Prometheus

Open source metrics and alerting system

Server MonitoringFree tier
4.2 ()
View Tool →
S

Sentry

Application error tracking and performance monitoring

Server MonitoringFree tier
4.2 ()
View Tool →
V

Vector

Collect, transform, and route logs and metrics at scale

Server MonitoringFree tier
4.2 ()
View Tool →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.