rsync.net vs MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup
A detailed comparison to help you choose between rsync.net and MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
rsync.net
0 reviews
4.0/5
MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup
0 reviews
Both rsync.net and MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup are equally rated at 4.0/5. rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001. MSP360 (formerly CloudBerry) provides backup for Windows, macOS, Linux, and VMs to any cloud storage: AWS, Azure, GCP, Wasabi, B2, and more. Used by IT service providers.
rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup Cross-platform backup to any cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Starting price | From $12/mo✓ | From $19.99/mo |
| Best for | Sysadmins who want SSH-native off-site backup storage with immutable snapshots, honest per-GB pricing, and humans on the support line. | MSPs and IT departments managing mixed Windows/Linux/macOS backups across many clients and multiple cloud storage backends |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Fremont, CA; Denver, CO; Zurich, Switzerland; Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | eu datacenterus datacenter | team features |
| Visit rsync.net → | Visit MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup → | |
rsync.net
Pros
- + Plain SSH-reachable UNIX filesystem: works with rsync, Borg, Restic, rclone, git-annex
- + Immutable ZFS snapshots on every standard account — strong ransomware protection
- + No egress charges, no contracts, and per-GB pricing that falls with volume
- + Own infrastructure in four locations (Fremont, Denver, Zurich, Hong Kong) with free account migration
- + Unlimited email and phone support from real engineers at every account size
Cons
- - No web UI — account management is email-based and the product is command-line only
- - 800 GB minimum on standard accounts; no free tier
- - Per-terabyte cost is higher than B2-class object storage for cold archives
- - No contractual uptime SLA published (resiliency claims are statistics, not commitments)
- - Bring your own backup tool, scheduling, and monitoring
MSP360 (CloudBerry) Backup
Pros
- + Storage-agnostic: agents back up to S3, Azure, GCS, Backblaze B2, Wasabi, IDrive e2, OpenStack, local and NAS targets
- + Genuine free tier for personal use (5 TB cap) and flat per-device pricing from $19.99/yr
- + Backup depth: image-based and block-level backup, bare-metal restore, client-side encryption, Object Lock immutability
- + Breadth of coverage — Windows/macOS/Linux, SQL, Exchange, Hyper-V, VMware, Proxmox, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace
- + MSP-grade management: central web console, per-client monitoring, white-label, 24/7 support on the managed tier
Cons
- - Pricing architecture is genuinely confusing — multiple products, editions, per-edition data caps, VAT-exclusive display
- - Storage costs sit on top of the license bill and come from a separate cloud provider account in most setups
- - Support is forum-based on free and community tiers; 24/7 live support is managed-tier only
- - Edition data caps (5 TB Desktop/Free, 1 TB Server/SQL) can force surprise upgrades on large file servers
- - UI breadth means complexity — restore flows and settings take learning, and the 2021 perpetual-to-subscription shift annoyed legacy buyers
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.