Skip to content

Zuplo vs Pipedream

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Zuplo and Pipedream.

Quick Verdict

3.8/5

Zuplo

0 reviews

4.1/5

Pipedream

0 reviews

Pipedream is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.8). Zuplo is a programmable API gateway with TypeScript policy handlers. Rate limiting, authentication, request validation, and documentation generated automatically. Deploy globally. Developer-first workflow automation with code steps (Node.js, Python, Go, Bash) over 2,500+ integrated apps and 10k+ triggers/actions. Credit-based pricing: Free plan at 300 credits/month, Basic $29/mo, Advanced $49/mo (annual). Now owned by Workday.

Zuplo

Zuplo

Programmable API gateway with serverless policies

Pipedream

Pipedream

Low-code integration platform for developers

Overview
Rating3.8 (0 reviews)4.1 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium, credit-based usage (1 credit per 30s compute at 256 MB)
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forAPI-first product teams wanting TypeScript-programmable gateway policy, OpenAPI-driven docs and hosted developer portals in one managed platformDeveloper teams automating integrations, webhooks, and AI-agent tooling who want managed auth and 2,500+ connectors instead of maintaining their own glue services
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
300+ edge locations worldwide
—
Tags
Tags
free tierapi access
free tierapi access
Visit Zuplo →Visit Pipedream →

Zuplo

Pros

  • + TypeScript policy code lives in your own repository with GitOps deployment and per-branch previews
  • + Free tier is genuinely usable: 100K requests/month, 300 edge locations, unlimited environments
  • + AI Gateway, MCP Gateway and hosted developer portal included on every plan, not sold as add-ons
  • + Publishes its pricing, including the Enterprise floor - rare in the API gateway category
  • + Auto-scaled edge deployment across 300+ locations with no cluster to manage

Cons

  • - Builder overage of $100 per additional 100K requests makes steady growth expensive
  • - No SLA of any kind below Enterprise, and only 99.5% at the Enterprise entry level
  • - Both Free and Builder cap the team at 2 developer seats; SSO/RBAC is Enterprise-gated
  • - Analytics beyond live logs is a 14-day trial on the lower tiers
  • - Small, 2021-founded company: thinner community and plugin ecosystem than Kong or AWS API Gateway
View full Zuploreview →

Pipedream

Pros

  • + Permanent free plan (300 credits/month, 3 active workflows, no credit card) with the full app library
  • + Real code steps with npm/PyPI, up to 10 GB RAM, 2 GB file system, no cold starts
  • + 2,500+ integrated apps with managed OAuth; Connect adds 3,000+ connectors and 10k+ tools for embedding
  • + Transparent credit metering (compute-time based) with documented limits and budget controls
  • + SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, GitHub sync with branch-based development, static egress IPs on Advanced

Cons

  • - Acquired by Workday (closed February 2026) — long-term product and pricing direction uncertain
  • - Credits burn fast on memory-heavy or fan-out workflows; production features gated behind the $49 plan
  • - No published uptime SLA or execution-region disclosure below enterprise contracts
  • - Proprietary workflow constructs — moving off Pipedream means rewriting the glue code
View full Pipedreamreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.