Zuplo vs Appwrite Cloud
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Zuplo and Appwrite Cloud.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Zuplo
0 reviews
3.9/5
Appwrite Cloud
0 reviews
Appwrite Cloud is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). Zuplo is a programmable API gateway with TypeScript policy handlers. Rate limiting, authentication, request validation, and documentation generated automatically. Deploy globally. Appwrite is an open source BaaS with database, authentication, storage, functions, and messaging. Self-hostable on Docker. Appwrite Cloud provides managed hosting.
Zuplo Programmable API gateway with serverless policies | Appwrite Cloud Open-source backend platform with built-in database, auth, and APIs | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 3.9 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | API-first product teams wanting TypeScript-programmable gateway policy, OpenAPI-driven docs and hosted developer portals in one managed platform | Developers and small teams who want a complete managed backend with a genuine self-hosting exit and refuse Firebase-style lock-in. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | 300+ edge locations worldwide | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Zuplo → | Visit Appwrite Cloud → | |
Zuplo
Pros
- + TypeScript policy code lives in your own repository with GitOps deployment and per-branch previews
- + Free tier is genuinely usable: 100K requests/month, 300 edge locations, unlimited environments
- + AI Gateway, MCP Gateway and hosted developer portal included on every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Publishes its pricing, including the Enterprise floor - rare in the API gateway category
- + Auto-scaled edge deployment across 300+ locations with no cluster to manage
Cons
- - Builder overage of $100 per additional 100K requests makes steady growth expensive
- - No SLA of any kind below Enterprise, and only 99.5% at the Enterprise entry level
- - Both Free and Builder cap the team at 2 developer seats; SSO/RBAC is Enterprise-gated
- - Analytics beyond live logs is a 14-day trial on the lower tiers
- - Small, 2021-founded company: thinner community and plugin ecosystem than Kong or AWS API Gateway
Appwrite Cloud
Pros
- + BSD 3-Clause open source with full self-hosting on any Docker host
- + Generous Pro resources: 2 TB bandwidth, 150 GB storage, 200K MAU at $25/month
- + Complete backend stack: auth, databases, storage, functions, realtime, messaging
- + Clear published overage rates and budget caps
- + Six regions across NA, EU, and APAC
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA on cloud plans
- - Free tier pauses projects after a week of inactivity; two-project limit
- - Per-project pricing multiplies cost for multi-project architectures
- - Smaller integration ecosystem than Firebase or Supabase
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.