Zuver vs Krystal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Zuver and Krystal.
Quick Verdict
2.8/5
Zuver
0 reviews
4.0/5
Krystal
0 reviews
Krystal is rated higher (4.0 vs 2.8). Zuver was an Australian hosting brand (shared, cPanel and WordPress hosting, AUD pricing, Australian datacenter and support). The brand is retired: no new orders, customers merged into parent brand VentraIP. Krystal is a UK hosting company running entirely on renewable energy. Shared, VPS, and reseller hosting. UK-focused with strong ethics, GDPR compliance, and Reforestation pledge per signup.
Zuver Retired Australian hosting brand - customers migrated to VentraIP | Krystal UK hosting powered by 100% renewable energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.8 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available | From $7/mo |
| Best for | Nobody new - existing Zuver customers finishing their migration to VentraIP, and Australian small businesses that should now buy from VentraIP directly | UK and EU businesses, charities, agencies and resellers who want transparent resource allocations, real UK support and verifiable green credentials, plus a UK-anchored cloud with S3-compatible storage |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 10 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99% | 99.99%✓ |
| Data-center count | — | 3 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €7.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €3.50 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | London, United KingdomAmsterdam, NetherlandsNew York, United States |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | apac datacenter | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Zuver → | Visit Krystal → | |
Zuver
Pros
- + Australian-owned infrastructure in Sydney with local support and AUD billing
- + Hourly backups and free SSL were standard on its plans
- + The successor platform (VentraIP) upgrades the terms: 99.9% uptime SLA, LiteSpeed, 45-day money-back guarantee
- + Free migration path for existing customers, with optional price lock-in during the transition
Cons
- - Brand retired and closed to new orders - not purchasable at any price
- - Australia-only datacenter, weak for European and North American visitors without a CDN
- - Shared-plan resource ceilings (2 vCPU / 2 GB RAM class) limit growing stores
- - Migration can change prices; locked-in rates are time-bound and not automatic
- - Split branding (Zuver plans, VentraIP infrastructure) left a transparency gap for customers
Krystal
Pros
- + Shared plans publish real CPU and RAM allocations — rare at this price
- + Concrete SLA: 100% network availability with service credits, 99.99% cloud uptime target
- + Verified sustainability: B Corp, 1% for the Planet, ISO 27001, renewable-powered data centres
- + UK-based support with phone access and a 60-day money-back guarantee
- + Krystal Cloud adds per-second VMs, S3-compatible storage and T4/L4 GPUs in London, Amsterdam and New York
Cons
- - Priced well above budget shared hosts for comparable raw resources
- - UK-centred: shared hosting is London-only, no APAC regions
- - 24/7 emergency phone support only on the pricier plans
- - Inconsistent DDoS figures (4,000Gbps vs 2.0 Tbps) across its own pages
- - Unlimited storage and bandwidth are bounded by inode limits and fair use
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.