Skip to content

Zeabur vs LucidLink

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Zeabur and LucidLink.

Quick Verdict

3.3/5

Zeabur

0 reviews

4.0/5

LucidLink

0 reviews

LucidLink is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.3). One-click deployments and managed databases on a subscription platform (Free $0, Dev $5, Pro $19, Team $79 per month) plus fixed-price servers from Tencent Cloud, Aliyun, Hetzner, AWS, GCP, Linode, DigitalOcean and Volcengine, or bring-your-own-server; the usage-billed shared cluster closed to new projects in March 2026. LucidLink turns S3 object storage into a shared, streaming cloud filesystem for teams working with large files.

Zeabur

Zeabur

Deploy services in seconds — APAC-focused PaaS

LucidLink

LucidLink

Cloud file streaming for teams: a shared filesystem on top of S3 object storage

Overview
Rating3.3 (0 reviews)4.0 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumpaid
Starting priceFree tier available✓From $7/mo
Best forIndividual developers and small teams in Asia-Pacific who want PaaS-style deployments on Seoul, Tokyo, Singapore or Greater China infrastructure, at fixed low monthly costCreative and production teams (video, audio, VFX, design) with large shared files and distributed members who need one live filesystem without syncing or shipping drives.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores2 vCPU—
RAM2 GB—
Storage——
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count10—
€/vCPU/mo€0.00—
€/GB RAM/mo€0.00—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier✓
Data-center locations
Regions
Newark, Dallas, Los Angeles, Seattle, Chicago, Toronto, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Singapore, Sydney (Zeabur clusters), plus marketplace regions via Tencent Cloud/Aliyun including Seoul, Jakarta, Manila, Hong Kong and mainland China
—
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
—
Visit Zeabur →

Zeabur

Pros

  • + Best budget-tier APAC coverage we have seen: Seoul, Jakarta, Manila, Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong and mainland China via Tencent Cloud and Aliyun
  • + PaaS ergonomics (auto build detection, templates, domains, SSL, monitoring, backups) over fixed-price servers or your own hosts
  • + Genuine free tier and cheap entry: Tencent 2C/2GB from $2-3/month plus a $0-5 plan fee
  • + Open-source tooling and documentation on GitHub, with an AI agent that provisions infrastructure from natural language

Cons

  • - Platform model changed in 2026 — shared usage-billed cluster closed to new projects with weeks of notice
  • - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier; reliability rests on the underlying provider
  • - Small, young vendor: thin operational documentation and Discord-first support
  • - Refund policy is unfriendly: roughly 30% Stripe fee on card refunds and no refunds on servers created or renewed after July 2025
View full Zeaburreview →

LucidLink

Pros

  • + Streams large shared files on demand — no full downloads before work starts
  • + Zero-knowledge encryption: the vendor cannot read customer content
  • + Transparent published per-member pricing with included storage per seat
  • + Built on S3, with bring-your-own-S3 on Enterprise for storage-substrate flexibility
  • + 30-day free trial without a credit card; desktop, mobile and web clients
  • + TeamCache add-on brings cloud files to on-prem users at LAN speed

Cons

  • - Storage overage of $7-8 per 100 GB is roughly $70-80 per TB per month — far above raw S3
  • - Starter tier is tightly capped: 10 members, 1 filespace, 1 TB, and no snapshot recovery
  • - Specialized for file-streaming workloads; wrong shape for databases or block storage
  • - No published region list or public uptime SLA outside Enterprise discussions
  • - Client and control-plane dependency on a mid-size specialist vendor
View full LucidLinkreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.