Zeabur vs CapRover
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Zeabur and CapRover.
Quick Verdict
3.3/5
Zeabur
0 reviews
4.0/5
CapRover
0 reviews
CapRover is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.3). One-click deployments and managed databases on a subscription platform (Free $0, Dev $5, Pro $19, Team $79 per month) plus fixed-price servers from Tencent Cloud, Aliyun, Hetzner, AWS, GCP, Linode, DigitalOcean and Volcengine, or bring-your-own-server; the usage-billed shared cluster closed to new projects in March 2026. CapRover is a free, open source PaaS that runs on your own server. Deploy apps via CLI, dashboard, or GitHub Actions. One-click app templates for WordPress, Ghost, Mattermost, Nextcloud, and 100+ more.
Zeabur Deploy services in seconds — APAC-focused PaaS | CapRover Self-hosted app deployment — free open source PaaS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.3 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Individual developers and small teams in Asia-Pacific who want PaaS-style deployments on Seoul, Tokyo, Singapore or Greater China infrastructure, at fixed low monthly cost | Developers and small teams wanting a free, self-hosted Heroku-style PaaS with one-click apps on their own VPS |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 2 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 2 GB | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 10 | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €0.00 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Newark, Dallas, Los Angeles, Seattle, Chicago, Toronto, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Singapore, Sydney (Zeabur clusters), plus marketplace regions via Tencent Cloud/Aliyun including Seoul, Jakarta, Manila, Hong Kong and mainland China | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Zeabur → | Visit CapRover → | |
Zeabur
Pros
- + Best budget-tier APAC coverage we have seen: Seoul, Jakarta, Manila, Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong and mainland China via Tencent Cloud and Aliyun
- + PaaS ergonomics (auto build detection, templates, domains, SSL, monitoring, backups) over fixed-price servers or your own hosts
- + Genuine free tier and cheap entry: Tencent 2C/2GB from $2-3/month plus a $0-5 plan fee
- + Open-source tooling and documentation on GitHub, with an AI agent that provisions infrastructure from natural language
Cons
- - Platform model changed in 2026 — shared usage-billed cluster closed to new projects with weeks of notice
- - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier; reliability rests on the underlying provider
- - Small, young vendor: thin operational documentation and Discord-first support
- - Refund policy is unfriendly: roughly 30% Stripe fee on card refunds and no refunds on servers created or renewed after July 2025
CapRover
Pros
- + Free forever, Apache 2.0, no feature gating or license keys
- + One-click app catalog (WordPress, MySQL, MongoDB, and more) deploys in minutes
- + Automatic Let's Encrypt HTTPS with one-click redirects
- + Deploys from dashboard, CLI, webhook, or Git; runs on any VPS you choose
- + Docker-native: any language or service that runs in a container
Cons
- - Largely solo-maintained — feature development has slowed and the bus factor is low
- - You own server ops: patching, backups, monitoring, and build sizing
- - Rougher edges and docs than commercial PaaS; support is community-only with no SLA
- - No autoscaling, managed backups, or Kubernetes-grade orchestration
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.