Skip to content

Zabbix vs Sentry

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Zabbix and Sentry.

Quick Verdict

4.2/5

Zabbix

0 reviews

4.2/5

Sentry

0 reviews

Both Zabbix and Sentry are equally rated at 4.2/5. Zabbix is a free, open source enterprise monitoring solution for networks, servers, cloud, and applications (AGPLv3 since v7.0). Developed by Zabbix SIA in Riga since 2005, with paid support subscriptions and an optional managed Zabbix Cloud service. Sentry is the industry standard for application error monitoring. Captures exceptions with full stack traces, performance monitoring, session replay, and release tracking. Open source.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Enterprise-grade infrastructure monitoring with predictive alerting

Sentry

Sentry

Application error tracking and performance monitoring

Overview
Rating4.2 (0 reviews)4.2 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forOps teams and MSPs monitoring heterogeneous infrastructure at scale who can own the platform and want costs that do not scale with host countDevelopment teams who want application errors caught, grouped, and traced before users report them, with a usable free tier to start
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage10 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime——
Data-center count5—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourceself hostable
free tieropen sourceself hostableapi accessteam features
Visit Zabbix →Visit Sentry →

Zabbix

Pros

  • + Free, no per-host or per-seat licensing — cost stays flat as monitored infrastructure grows
  • + Deep protocol coverage: agent2, SNMP, IPMI, JMX, HTTP, synthetic checks, Kubernetes
  • + 25 years of field-hardened releases with a disciplined LTS support schedule (7.0 LTS to June 2029)
  • + Zabbix Cloud removes the ops burden without changing the tool; 5-day trial without a credit card
  • + Open source under AGPLv3 with a documented API, Terraform provider and large template ecosystem

Cons

  • - Steep learning curve — configuration UI, trigger syntax and template design need real investment
  • - Zabbix Cloud drops values at random above the NVPS cap and disk only grows (once per 24h, never shrinks)
  • - No published numeric uptime SLA or public region list for Zabbix Cloud; compliance certifications still in progress
  • - Weaker on logs and distributed tracing than modern observability suites; self-hosting means you own the upkeep
View full Zabbixreview →

Sentry

Pros

  • + Industry-standard error grouping and stack traces with code context
  • + Free Developer plan at $0 including error monitoring and tracing
  • + Framework SDKs make setup a one-afternoon job
  • + EU data residency (Frankfurt) at no extra cost on all plans
  • + Covers tracing, session replay, release health, cron and uptime monitors in one subscription
  • + Self-hostable server code for teams that must run their own stack

Cons

  • - Usage-based overage on errors, spans, and replays can spike bills unexpectedly
  • - Real setup work needed to control noise (grouping, filters, sampling)
  • - No public uptime SLA on self-serve plans
  • - No APAC data region; some account metadata stays in the US even on EU orgs
  • - Self-hosted deployment is operationally heavy and the license is not plain OSI open source
View full Sentryreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.