YugabyteDB vs TigerData
A detailed comparison to help you choose between YugabyteDB and TigerData.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
YugabyteDB
0 reviews
4.2/5
TigerData
0 reviews
TigerData is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). YugabyteDB is a cloud-native distributed PostgreSQL-compatible database designed for global, highly available applications. Active-active geo-distribution, ACID transactions, and auto-sharding. TigerData, from the creators of TimescaleDB, is a PostgreSQL cloud platform built for time-series and real-time analytics workloads at large scale, aimed at developers and enterprises.
YugabyteDB Distributed SQL database built for global applications | TigerData PostgreSQL-native time-series database for metrics, events, and analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.2 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | From $30/mo✓ |
| Best for | Teams with concrete multi-zone or multi-region requirements who want Postgres semantics, a published SLA, and an open-source core they can self-host as an exit path | Teams building observability, IoT/telemetry, financial or real-time analytics platforms who want time-series performance inside standard PostgreSQL and can run the ops model of a managed Postgres service. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 2 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 4 GB | — |
| Storage | 10 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.99%✓ | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 17 |
| €/vCPU/mo | €62.50 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €31.25 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | AWS/Azure/GCP regions across US, EU and APAC | 13 AWS regions + 4 Azure regions across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and South America |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourcemanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit YugabyteDB → | Visit TigerData → | |
YugabyteDB
Pros
- + Apache 2.0 open core you can self-host without revenue caps or telemetry — real exit option
- + Postgres-compatible SQL with ACID across zones and regions, automatic sharding and failover
- + Published 99.99% SLA with a concrete service-credit table
- + One price model across AWS, Azure, GCP and BYOC; 24/7 support on every paid tier
- + Migration tooling (Voyager) and Terraform/CLI/API automation included, not upsold
Cons
- - Premium pricing: a 3-node/6-vCPU production cluster runs ~$750/month before storage, and PITR is a $25/vCPU/month add-on on Professional
- - Distributed-systems complexity remains even when managed — consistency modes and region placement need real understanding
- - PostgreSQL-compatible, not PostgreSQL-complete; extension and edge-case behaviour gaps exist
- - Free Sandbox is evaluation-only (1 node, 15 connections, deleted after 15 inactive days)
TigerData
Pros
- + Full SQL and the PostgreSQL extension ecosystem — hypertables, continuous aggregates and 90%+ compression without a new query language
- + Published consumption pricing (compute from $30/month, storage $0.177-0.212/GB-month) with hourly metering and no instance-size lock-in
- + 17 regions across AWS and Azure with EU, US and APAC residency selectable at creation
- + Reliability productized: multi-AZ HA, PITR up to 14 days, backup retention to 180 days, cross-region restore, public SLA and status page
- + Open-source TimescaleDB escape hatch — self-hosting stays viable, which keeps pricing honest
Cons
- - Hourly compute meter bills full hours and forgotten scale-ups at the higher config are expensive
- - Serious reliability and security features (multi-node HA, 14-day PITR, SOC 2, private endpoints) gated behind Scale or Enterprise
- - PostgreSQL and time-series concepts (chunks, compression/retention policies) assumed — not a zero-ops database for non-database teams
- - Effective storage price assumes 5x compression; actual ratios are workload-dependent
- - Aiven-partnered legacy MST product carries a different (99.99%) SLA — easy to confuse with Tiger Cloud
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.