Skip to content

YugabyteDB vs SingleStore

A detailed comparison to help you choose between YugabyteDB and SingleStore.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

YugabyteDB

0 reviews

3.8/5

SingleStore

0 reviews

YugabyteDB is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). YugabyteDB is a cloud-native distributed PostgreSQL-compatible database designed for global, highly available applications. Active-active geo-distribution, ACID transactions, and auto-sharding. SingleStore (formerly MemSQL) is a cloud-native database combining OLTP and OLAP in a single system. Handles real-time analytics and transactions without ETL. Used by financial services and gaming companies.

YugabyteDB

YugabyteDB

Distributed SQL database built for global applications

SingleStore

SingleStore

Real-time analytics and transactions in one database

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)✓3.8 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumusage-based
Starting priceFrom $125/moFree tier available✓
Best forTeams with concrete multi-zone or multi-region requirements who want Postgres semantics, a published SLA, and an open-source core they can self-host as an exit pathTeams with genuinely mixed transactional and analytical workloads — fraud, risk, adtech, IoT, live gaming — that need sub-second freshness and want to retire a separate warehouse and sync pipeline.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores2 vCPU—
RAM4 GB—
Storage10 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.99%—
Data-center count——
€/vCPU/mo€62.50—
€/GB RAM/mo€31.25—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots✓
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
AWS/Azure/GCP regions across US, EU and APAC
—
Tags
Tags
free tieropen sourcemanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapi access
Visit YugabyteDB →Visit SingleStore →

YugabyteDB

Pros

  • + Apache 2.0 open core you can self-host without revenue caps or telemetry — real exit option
  • + Postgres-compatible SQL with ACID across zones and regions, automatic sharding and failover
  • + Published 99.99% SLA with a concrete service-credit table
  • + One price model across AWS, Azure, GCP and BYOC; 24/7 support on every paid tier
  • + Migration tooling (Voyager) and Terraform/CLI/API automation included, not upsold

Cons

  • - Premium pricing: a 3-node/6-vCPU production cluster runs ~$750/month before storage, and PITR is a $25/vCPU/month add-on on Professional
  • - Distributed-systems complexity remains even when managed — consistency modes and region placement need real understanding
  • - PostgreSQL-compatible, not PostgreSQL-complete; extension and edge-case behaviour gaps exist
  • - Free Sandbox is evaluation-only (1 node, 15 connections, deleted after 15 inactive days)
View full YugabyteDBreview →

SingleStore

Pros

  • + Transactions and analytics in one engine — no ETL pipeline between an operational database and a warehouse
  • + Published, itemised rate card: workspace sizes, credit burn, storage tiers and every multiplier are public
  • + Genuine free evaluation tier plus $500 of credits on Standard
  • + MySQL-compatible wire protocol shortens migration from MySQL-based stacks
  • + Documented compliance posture (ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, CCPA, GDPR) and a BYOC option for data residency

Cons

  • - Stacking multipliers (Enterprise 1.5x, Multi-AZ 1.3x, region tier, scaling) make real bills hard to predict from headline prices
  • - Distributed-engine concepts (shard keys, distribution, reference tables) are overkill for simple CRUD applications
  • - Free Shared tier is explicitly non-production and self-support only
  • - Self-managed licensing and BYOC/Dedicated pricing require a sales conversation
View full SingleStorereview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.