YugabyteDB vs Appwrite Cloud
A detailed comparison to help you choose between YugabyteDB and Appwrite Cloud.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
YugabyteDB
0 reviews
3.9/5
Appwrite Cloud
0 reviews
YugabyteDB is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.9). YugabyteDB is a cloud-native distributed PostgreSQL-compatible database designed for global, highly available applications. Active-active geo-distribution, ACID transactions, and auto-sharding. Appwrite is an open source BaaS with database, authentication, storage, functions, and messaging. Self-hostable on Docker. Appwrite Cloud provides managed hosting.
YugabyteDB Distributed SQL database built for global applications | Appwrite Cloud Open-source backend platform with built-in database, auth, and APIs | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.9 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Teams with concrete multi-zone or multi-region requirements who want Postgres semantics, a published SLA, and an open-source core they can self-host as an exit path | Developers and small teams who want a complete managed backend with a genuine self-hosting exit and refuse Firebase-style lock-in. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 2 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 4 GB | — |
| Storage | 10 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.99% | — |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €62.50 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €31.25 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | AWS/Azure/GCP regions across US, EU and APAC | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourcemanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit YugabyteDB → | Visit Appwrite Cloud → | |
YugabyteDB
Pros
- + Apache 2.0 open core you can self-host without revenue caps or telemetry — real exit option
- + Postgres-compatible SQL with ACID across zones and regions, automatic sharding and failover
- + Published 99.99% SLA with a concrete service-credit table
- + One price model across AWS, Azure, GCP and BYOC; 24/7 support on every paid tier
- + Migration tooling (Voyager) and Terraform/CLI/API automation included, not upsold
Cons
- - Premium pricing: a 3-node/6-vCPU production cluster runs ~$750/month before storage, and PITR is a $25/vCPU/month add-on on Professional
- - Distributed-systems complexity remains even when managed — consistency modes and region placement need real understanding
- - PostgreSQL-compatible, not PostgreSQL-complete; extension and edge-case behaviour gaps exist
- - Free Sandbox is evaluation-only (1 node, 15 connections, deleted after 15 inactive days)
Appwrite Cloud
Pros
- + BSD 3-Clause open source with full self-hosting on any Docker host
- + Generous Pro resources: 2 TB bandwidth, 150 GB storage, 200K MAU at $25/month
- + Complete backend stack: auth, databases, storage, functions, realtime, messaging
- + Clear published overage rates and budget caps
- + Six regions across NA, EU, and APAC
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA on cloud plans
- - Free tier pauses projects after a week of inactivity; two-project limit
- - Per-project pricing multiplies cost for multi-project architectures
- - Smaller integration ecosystem than Firebase or Supabase
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.