Vultr vs Latitude.sh
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Vultr and Latitude.sh.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Vultr
0 reviews
3.8/5
Latitude.sh
0 reviews
Vultr is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). Vultr is a cloud platform offering VPS, bare metal servers, and Kubernetes hosting across 32 data centers worldwide. Built for developers and businesses needing scalable, reliable compute resources with transparent billing. Latitude.sh provides on-demand bare metal cloud in underserved markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and also US, EU, and Asia. Sub-5-minute deployment, API-first, and Kubernetes support.
Vultr High-performance cloud infrastructure with global data centers and competitive pricing | Latitude.sh Bare metal cloud in Latin America and worldwide | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | usage-based |
| Starting price | From $2.5/mo✓ | From $69/mo |
| Best for | Teams needing low-latency compute across multiple continents, API-first fleets, and self-serve GPU or bare metal with predictable billing | Teams needing dedicated hardware with automated deployment in specific cities — especially Latin America — for latency-sensitive or AI workloads, with their own ops function. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 1 vCPU | 12 vCPU✓ |
| RAM | 1 GB | 32 GB✓ |
| Storage | 10 GB | 800 GB✓ |
| Bandwidth | 1 TB/mo | 20 TB/mo✓ |
| SLA uptime | 100%✓ | 99.5% |
| Data-center count | 34✓ | 23 |
| €/vCPU/mo | €2.50✓ | €5.75 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €2.50 | €2.16✓ |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | 4,100 | — |
| Disk read (fio) | 1,800 MB/s | — |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | 38,000 | — |
| Network out | 1 Gbps | — |
| Latency (TTFB) | 24 ms | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | 34 regions across North/South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa (see locations page) | [US x6, London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago, Singapore, Tokyo, Sydney] |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available | hourly billingnvme storageipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accesskubernetes support |
| Visit Vultr → | Visit Latitude.sh → | |
Vultr
Pros
- + Truly global: 34 regions on six continents from one console, one API, one price list - with per-region test IPs published
- + Fully published hourly and monthly pricing from $2.50/mo, mature REST API and Terraform provider
- + 100% network and host-node uptime SLA with credits; standardized platform behavior across every region
- + Broad self-serve catalog: NVMe optimized VMs, NVIDIA/AMD GPUs, bare metal, managed databases/Kafka, S3-compatible object storage, VKE
Cons
- - Price-performance trails European leaders: our measured HF 2GB (Amsterdam) had the slowest NVMe storage of six tested providers at a mid-range price
- - Backups cost 20% of instance price, snapshots bill per GB, Windows and extra egress are add-ons
- - No refunds in the terms of service; support is ticket-only for self-serve customers
- - Overlapping instance families (Cloud Compute, VX1, Optimized) make it easy to pick a stale SKU; region count differs across Vultr's own pages (32/33/34)
Latitude.sh
Pros
- + Real bare metal with cloud-style API/Terraform provisioning in minutes
- + Published price list including GPU nodes (1x H100 at $1.68/hr on-demand)
- + 20 TB free outbound traffic per server, unmetered inbound
- + Latin American sites (Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Santiago) few competitors match
- + Megaport backing and a $594M 2026 raise aimed at AI inference capacity
Cons
- - Unmanaged — no OS administration, and backups are not included
- - Published SLA is only 99.5% for bare-metal power/uplink and VM instances
- - Per-site stock limits; popular plans can exist in only one or two locations
- - Regional pricing differences (LATAM/APAC cost more than the US price)
- - Product direction in flux after the 2025 Megaport merger and AI pivot
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.