Vultr vs DataPacket

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Vultr and DataPacket.

Vultr

Vultr

32 datacenter locations globally

DataPacket

DataPacket

Global bare metal with 35 datacenter locations

Overview
Rating4.2 (499 reviews)3.9 (175 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom €5/moFrom €80/mo
Best forApplications that need specific geographic datacenter locations — especially APAC, Africa, or South AmericaNetwork-intensive businesses needing bare metal in many global locations with high-bandwidth uplinks
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores1 vCPU
RAM1 GB
Storage25 GB
Bandwidth1 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count32
€/vCPU/mo€5.00
€/GB RAM/mo€5.00
Performance
CPU score (sysbench)4,100
Disk read (fio)1,800 MB/s
Disk IOPS (4K random)38,000
Network out1 Gbps
Latency (TTFB)24 ms
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6
Tags
Tags
hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available
nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Vultr →Visit DataPacket →

Vultr

Pros

  • + 32 global datacenter locations — most in the market
  • + High Frequency NVMe plans are competitively fast
  • + Bare Metal Cloud available on-demand

Cons

  • - Bandwidth overages can get expensive on low-end plans
  • - UI less polished than DigitalOcean
View full Vultrreview →

DataPacket

Pros

  • + 35 global datacenter locations
  • + 100Gbps uplink available
  • + Custom hardware configurations

Cons

  • - Complex pricing
  • - Enterprise-focused
View full DataPacketreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.