Vultr Load Balancer vs HAProxy
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Vultr Load Balancer and HAProxy.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Vultr Load Balancer
264 reviews
3.6/5
HAProxy
327 reviews
Vultr Load Balancer is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.6). Vultr Load Balancer distributes traffic across Vultr instances in any of their 32 global locations. SSL termination, health checks, and layer 4/7 support. Per-hour billing. HAProxy is a free, open source, high-performance TCP/HTTP load balancer. Handles 100,000+ concurrent connections. Used by Reddit, Tumblr, and AWS. Known for reliability over many years.
Vultr Load Balancer Managed load balancer across 32 global locations | HAProxy The reliable open source load balancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (264 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (327 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Starting price | From €10/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Vultr Cloud users wanting a managed load balancer in their specific regional datacenter | High-traffic applications needing the most reliable open source load balancer for TCP/HTTP traffic |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingmanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Vultr Load Balancer → | Visit HAProxy → | |
Vultr Load Balancer
Pros
- + Available in all 32 Vultr global locations
- + SSL termination and health checks
- + Hourly billing
Cons
- - Vultr only
- - Less advanced routing than AWS ALB
HAProxy
Pros
- + Handles 100,000+ concurrent connections
- + Very reliable — used by Reddit and AWS
- + Free and open source
Cons
- - No built-in GUI — configuration is file-based
- - Less feature-rich than enterprise solutions for advanced routing
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.