Vultr Load Balancer vs HAProxy
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Vultr Load Balancer and HAProxy.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Vultr Load Balancer
0 reviews
4.5/5
HAProxy
0 reviews
HAProxy is rated higher (4.5 vs 3.5). Vultr Load Balancer distributes traffic across Vultr instances in any of their 33 global regions. Layer 4 (TCP/UDP) with configurable health checks and automatic failover. No SSL termination — TLS must be terminated at the backend. Hourly billing at $0.015/hour. HAProxy is a free, open source, high-performance TCP/HTTP load balancer. Handles 100,000+ concurrent connections. Used by Reddit, Tumblr, and AWS. Known for reliability over many years.
Vultr Load Balancer Managed Layer 4 load balancer across 33 global regions | HAProxy The reliable open source load balancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (0 reviews) | 4.5 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | free |
| Starting price | From $10/mo | Free✓ |
| Best for | Teams already on Vultr who want managed failover and health-checked traffic distribution for a single-region cluster and handle TLS on their backends | Teams running their own infrastructure who want a proven, free, high-performance TCP/HTTP load balancer and are comfortable with configuration files |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingmanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Vultr Load Balancer → | Visit HAProxy → | |
Vultr Load Balancer
Pros
- + Fully managed with built-in health checks and automatic failover — no balancer VM to patch
- + Simple pricing: from $10/month ($0.015/hour), and bandwidth is charged on attached instances only
- + Available in all 33 Vultr regions, with optional global routing to the nearest healthy server
- + Full API/CLI support, so it fits Terraform and Ansible workflows
- + Works with any TCP/UDP application: web, APIs, game servers, database pools
Cons
- - No SSL termination despite marketing language about certificates — TLS must be handled at the backend
- - Layer 4 only: no path-based routing, header rules, WAF, or rate limiting
- - Balances Vultr instances only, in the same region — no hybrid or multi-provider backends
- - Price varies by data center without a published per-region table
- - DDoS mitigation is not part of the product; it is handled at Vultr's infrastructure level or as a paid add-on
HAProxy
Pros
- + Free and open source — no metering, no feature paywall
- + 25 years of production use at very large scale
- + Strong documented performance with lean memory use
- + Transparent LTS lifecycle with published end-of-life dates
- + Layer 4 and 7, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, gRPC, Lua and a REST API
Cons
- - File-based configuration only — no GUI in the community edition
- - No support or SLA unless you buy HAProxy Enterprise
- - Advanced security (WAF, bot management) is an enterprise add-on or DIY
- - You bring the infrastructure — no managed service in the free tier
- - Linux-first; other platforms are second-class
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.