Veeam vs Wasabi
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Veeam and Wasabi.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Veeam
0 reviews
4.0/5
Wasabi
0 reviews
Wasabi is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.8). Veeam is the leading enterprise backup platform for VMware, Hyper-V, physical, and cloud workloads. Used by 450,000+ organizations. Instant recovery, replication, and backup copy jobs. S3-compatible cloud storage priced at a flat $7.99 per TB per month with no fees for downloads or API requests, widely used for backups.
Veeam Enterprise backup for VMs and cloud | Wasabi Hot cloud storage at cold storage prices | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $7.99/mo |
| Best for | Enterprise IT teams running heterogeneous VM, physical, and cloud estates with contractual restore requirements and staff to operate a real backup platform | Backup, offsite copy, and media-archive storage where data is written once, kept for months or years, and read occasionally — especially at 500 GB and above |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 16 regions: US (N. Virginia x2, Texas, Oregon, California), Canada (Toronto), Netherlands (Amsterdam), Germany (Frankfurt), UK x2, France (Paris), Italy (Milan), Japan x2 (Tokyo, Osaka), Singapore, Australia (Sydney) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuressso | s3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessgdpr compliant |
| Visit Veeam → | Visit Wasabi → | |
Veeam
Pros
- + Industry-standard coverage: VMs, physical, cloud, SaaS, Kubernetes, NAS under one portable license
- + Real free tier: Community Edition protects up to 10 workloads with full functionality
- + Verified restores, instant recovery, and hardened immutable repositories against ransomware
- + No hardware or cloud lock-in — runs on your infrastructure, restores to any platform
- + Mature support organization, published licensing policy, decades-long track record
Cons
- - No public list prices — VUL pricing is quote-based through resellers
- - Operational complexity: management server, proxies, repositories need trained staff
- - Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Kasten licenses sit outside VUL, adding separate invoices
- - Community Edition requires telemetry consent and caps at one install per source infrastructure
- - Overkill for small estates; lighter tools cover a handful of machines more cheaply
Wasabi
Pros
- + Flat $7.99/TB/month with zero egress and API request charges — bills are predictable to the dollar
- + S3-compatible API with broad backup-software support (Veeam, rclone, Synology, MSP360 and others)
- + 16 regions with per-bucket region pinning, covering US, EU, and APAC data-residency needs
- + Credit-backed 99.9% uptime SLA with a published error-rate measurement methodology
- + No cold-tier latency: everything is hot storage, so restores are immediate
Cons
- - 90-day minimum storage duration — early deletion or overwriting incurs Timed Deleted Storage charges
- - 1 TB minimum monthly charge makes small datasets uneconomical
- - Fair-use policy implicitly caps monthly egress near stored volume — not a CDN origin play
- - Single storage tier only; no cheap cold class for rarely-retrieved archives
- - Basic support only on Pay-as-You-Go; Premium support is tied to Reserved Capacity contracts
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.