Veeam vs Restic
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Veeam and Restic.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Veeam
0 reviews
4.3/5
Restic
0 reviews
Restic is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.8). Veeam is the leading enterprise backup platform for VMware, Hyper-V, physical, and cloud workloads. Used by 450,000+ organizations. Instant recovery, replication, and backup copy jobs. Restic is a modern backup program that uses content-addressable storage, deduplication, and AES-256 encryption. Backs up to S3, B2, Google Cloud, SFTP, and more. No server required.
Veeam Enterprise backup for VMs and cloud | Restic Fast, secure, encrypted open source backup | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Enterprise IT teams running heterogeneous VM, physical, and cloud estates with contractual restore requirements and staff to operate a real backup platform | Developers and sysadmins who want encrypted, deduplicated off-site backups to any storage backend and are comfortable owning key management and operations. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuressso | free tieropen source |
| Visit Veeam → | Visit Restic → | |
Veeam
Pros
- + Industry-standard coverage: VMs, physical, cloud, SaaS, Kubernetes, NAS under one portable license
- + Real free tier: Community Edition protects up to 10 workloads with full functionality
- + Verified restores, instant recovery, and hardened immutable repositories against ransomware
- + No hardware or cloud lock-in — runs on your infrastructure, restores to any platform
- + Mature support organization, published licensing policy, decades-long track record
Cons
- - No public list prices — VUL pricing is quote-based through resellers
- - Operational complexity: management server, proxies, repositories need trained staff
- - Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Kasten licenses sit outside VUL, adding separate invoices
- - Community Edition requires telemetry consent and caps at one install per source infrastructure
- - Overkill for small estates; lighter tools cover a handful of machines more cheaply
Restic
Pros
- + Free BSD-2-Clause software with no paid tier or usage caps
- + Client-side AES-256-CTR encryption with Poly1305 authentication is always on
- + Content-addressed deduplication: incremental backups and multi-machine repositories
- + Native support for S3, B2, GCS, Azure Blob, SFTP, and REST backends; rclone for the rest
- + Openly documented repository format — no vendor lock-in, portable repositories
Cons
- - No password recovery: lose the repository key and the data is gone
- - Command-line only — scheduling, monitoring, and alerting are external
- - Community support only; no SLA or paid support option
- - Repository maintenance (prune, check) requires operational discipline
- - Pre-1.0 version numbering; the API surface can still shift between releases
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.