Veeam vs Amazon S3
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Veeam and Amazon S3.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Veeam
0 reviews
4.1/5
Amazon S3
0 reviews
Amazon S3 is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.8). Veeam is the leading enterprise backup platform for VMware, Hyper-V, physical, and cloud workloads. Used by 450,000+ organizations. Instant recovery, replication, and backup copy jobs. AWS S3 stores and retrieves unlimited amounts of data via a simple web interface. Built for developers, enterprises, and anyone needing reliable, durable cloud storage with pay-as-you-go pricing.
Veeam Enterprise backup for VMs and cloud |  Amazon S3 Scalable object storage for any data size or type | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews) | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | pay-as-you-go (per GB-month + per 1,000 requests + retrieval/transfer) |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $0.023/mo |
| Best for | Enterprise IT teams running heterogeneous VM, physical, and cloud estates with contractual restore requirements and staff to operate a real backup platform | Teams building on AWS who need durable, API-stable object storage for backups, data lakes, static content and archives — and who value tooling compatibility over the lowest per-GB rate |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 39 AWS regions / 123-124 AZs |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuressso | free tiers3 compatibleapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider |
| Visit Veeam → | Visit Amazon S3 → | |
Veeam
Pros
- + Industry-standard coverage: VMs, physical, cloud, SaaS, Kubernetes, NAS under one portable license
- + Real free tier: Community Edition protects up to 10 workloads with full functionality
- + Verified restores, instant recovery, and hardened immutable repositories against ransomware
- + No hardware or cloud lock-in — runs on your infrastructure, restores to any platform
- + Mature support organization, published licensing policy, decades-long track record
Cons
- - No public list prices — VUL pricing is quote-based through resellers
- - Operational complexity: management server, proxies, repositories need trained staff
- - Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Kasten licenses sit outside VUL, adding separate invoices
- - Community Edition requires telemetry consent and caps at one install per source infrastructure
- - Overkill for small estates; lighter tools cover a handful of machines more cheaply
Amazon S3
Pros
- + Designed for 11 nines durability with cross-AZ replication by default and strong read-after-write consistency
- + The S3 API is the industry standard — code written in 2006 still works, and third-party compatibility is everywhere
- + 23x cost ladder from Standard down to Glacier Deep Archive at $0.00099/GB-month, with lifecycle automation
- + Deepest storage feature set available: versioning, Object Lock, replication, inventory, event notifications, access management
Cons
- - Egress at $0.09/GB and per-request pricing produce surprise bills for chatty or restore-heavy workloads
- - IA and Glacier classes add retrieval fees and latency — the restore path must be priced separately
- - Policy configuration (bucket policies, IAM, Block Public Access, KMS keys) is complex and historically error-prone
- - SLA (99.9%/99.0%) is far below the durability figure — availability and durability are different promises
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.