Veeam vs Acronis Cyber Protect
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Veeam and Acronis Cyber Protect.
Quick Verdict
3.8/5
Veeam
0 reviews
3.6/5
Acronis Cyber Protect
0 reviews
Veeam is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.6). Veeam is the leading enterprise backup platform for VMware, Hyper-V, physical, and cloud workloads. Used by 450,000+ organizations. Instant recovery, replication, and backup copy jobs. Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup with AI-based malware and ransomware protection. Physical, virtual, and cloud workload backup with 50+ cloud storage destinations.
Veeam Enterprise backup for VMs and cloud | Acronis Cyber Protect Backup with built-in anti-malware protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From $85/mo |
| Best for | Enterprise IT teams running heterogeneous VM, physical, and cloud estates with contractual restore requirements and staff to operate a real backup platform | IT teams and MSPs running mixed physical, virtual, and Microsoft 365 estates who want backup and endpoint protection consolidated into one console, with control over where backup data is stored. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Acronis-operated sites plus Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure regions (26 data centers per 2021 briefing), incl. Singapore, Japan, Australia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuressso | mobile appteam features |
| Visit Veeam → | Visit Acronis Cyber Protect → | |
Veeam
Pros
- + Industry-standard coverage: VMs, physical, cloud, SaaS, Kubernetes, NAS under one portable license
- + Real free tier: Community Edition protects up to 10 workloads with full functionality
- + Verified restores, instant recovery, and hardened immutable repositories against ransomware
- + No hardware or cloud lock-in — runs on your infrastructure, restores to any platform
- + Mature support organization, published licensing policy, decades-long track record
Cons
- - No public list prices — VUL pricing is quote-based through resellers
- - Operational complexity: management server, proxies, repositories need trained staff
- - Microsoft 365, Salesforce, and Kasten licenses sit outside VUL, adding separate invoices
- - Community Edition requires telemetry consent and caps at one install per source infrastructure
- - Overkill for small estates; lighter tools cover a handful of machines more cheaply
Acronis Cyber Protect
Pros
- + Backup and endpoint security (anti-malware, patch management, EDR on Advanced) unified in one agent and console
- + Wide storage flexibility: 26+ Acronis/Google/Azure data centers plus S3, Wasabi, Swift, NFS and on-prem S3-compatible destinations
- + Image-based backups with incremental chains, deduplication, and pre-restore malware scanning fit ransomware recovery planning
- + Coverage across Windows/Linux servers, VMs, workstations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, NAS, and mobile
- + Two licensing models (per-workload and per-GB) let matching your workload shape cut costs significantly
Cons
- - Licensing matrix is genuinely confusing; server protection at roughly $595–$925/server/year dwarfs workstation pricing
- - The combined agent can be heavy on CPU and memory on constrained endpoints
- - Backup-only buyers pay for a security platform they may not want; console complexity reflects five jobs in one product
- - Vendor scale figures and destination counts are marketing claims with limited independent verification
- - Support and SLA terms differ between direct business products and the service-provider platform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.