UptimeRobot vs SigNoz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between UptimeRobot and SigNoz.
Quick Verdict
3.7/5
UptimeRobot
0 reviews
4.0/5
SigNoz
0 reviews
SigNoz is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.7). Monitors website availability and sends notifications when your site goes down. Tracks response times and logs uptime history for SLAs. SigNoz is a full-stack open source observability platform — metrics, traces, and logs in one. Datadog alternative you can self-host. Uses ClickHouse for efficient storage.
UptimeRobot Website uptime monitoring with instant alerts | SigNoz Open-source observability platform for logs, metrics, and traces | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Hobby projects, freelancers and small teams wanting generous free or low-cost uptime monitoring with status pages | Engineering teams priced out of Datadog or New Relic that want OpenTelemetry-native logs, metrics and traces with computable usage-based costs and US/EU/India data residency. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global | United States, European Union, India (SigNoz Cloud regions) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit UptimeRobot → | Visit SigNoz → | |
UptimeRobot
Pros
- + Best free tier in the category for non-commercial use: 50 monitors at 5-minute intervals, no credit card
- + Broad monitor coverage: HTTP, ping, port, keyword, API, UDP, DNS, SSL/domain expiry with confirmation re-checks
- + Four probe regions (NA/EU/Asia/Australia) with per-region thresholds and multi-region status tracking on paid plans
- + Published monitoring IP allow-list (IPv4 + IPv6) with a live API endpoint — firewall onboarding made simple
- + Status pages at every tier; white-label, own-domain, translated pages on Team and above
Cons
- - Free plan restricted to personal, non-commercial use since October 2024 — off the table for revenue sites
- - Slack/webhooks/PagerDuty integrations wait until Team ($39/mo annual); Solo users pay triple for a Slack alert
- - Pricing churn: 2025 restructuring plus monitor-count sliders, $15/mo extra seats and SMS credits make totals hard to predict
- - Interval speed is tier-bound (5 min / 60s / 30s / 15s) and there is no public SLA outside Enterprise
- - No built-in incident management (escalation, on-call); ownership marked acquired by third-party records without a published buyer
SigNoz
Pros
- + Usage-based pricing with published per-unit rates ($0.30/GB logs and traces, $0.10/mn metric samples) and no per-user or per-host billing
- + OpenTelemetry-native: no proprietary SDKs, so instrumentation does not lock you in
- + Logs, metrics, traces, APM, exceptions and alerts correlated in one ClickHouse-backed product
- + Self-hostable open-source community edition plus cloud regions in the US, EU and India with SOC2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
- + Worked pricing examples and a bill calculator published — costs are computable before you commit
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA below the Enterprise tier (from $4,000/month)
- - Self-hosted community edition makes storage, scaling, upgrades and backups your operational problem
- - Usage bills move with retention choices and noisy telemetry; the $49 entry tier shows a struck-through $199 base price
- - Narrower turnkey integration ecosystem than Datadog; RBAC is beta and audit logs/multi-tenancy are roadmap items
- - Migration tooling and dedicated Slack support are gated at spends above $999/month
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.