Upstash vs SingleStore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Upstash and SingleStore.
Quick Verdict
4.3/5
Upstash
105 reviews
3.8/5
SingleStore
348 reviews
Upstash is rated higher (4.3 vs 3.8). Serverless Redis, Kafka, and QStash with per-request pricing. Zero management, global replication, and REST API for edge functions. Free tier includes 10,000 daily commands. SingleStore (formerly MemSQL) is a cloud-native database combining OLTP and OLAP in a single system. Handles real-time analytics and transactions without ETL. Used by financial services and gaming companies.
Upstash Serverless Redis, Kafka, QStash — per-request pricing | SingleStore Real-time analytics and transactions in one database | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (105 reviews)✓ | 3.8 (348 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Serverless and edge function developers needing caching, queuing, and rate limiting without managing Redis | Financial services, gaming, and analytics companies needing real-time queries across both transactions and analytics |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapi access |
| Visit Upstash → | Visit SingleStore → | |
Upstash
Pros
- + Per-request pricing — pay for actual usage
- + REST API works in edge functions
- + Global replication for low latency
Cons
- - Redis limitations on complex queries
- - Not for relational data
SingleStore
Pros
- + HTAP — handles both transactions and analytics
- + Real-time query performance
- + Free shared tier available
Cons
- - Not suitable for simple CRUD apps
- - Complex pricing at scale
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.