UpCloud vs Cherry Servers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between UpCloud and Cherry Servers.
UpCloud MaxIOPS storage tops disk benchmarks consistently | Cherry Servers Lithuanian bare metal and cloud at EU pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (367 reviews) | 4.8 (383 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €7/mo | From €6/mo✓ |
| Best for | Database-heavy applications in Europe where disk I/O performance is the primary bottleneck | EU developers wanting affordable bare metal or VPS with hourly billing and full API control |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | 4,600 | — |
| Disk read (fio) | 2,800 MB/s | — |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | 62,000 | — |
| Network out | 1 Gbps | — |
| Latency (TTFB) | 22 ms | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacentergdpr compliantapi accessprivate networking | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacentergdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit UpCloud → | Visit Cherry Servers → | |
UpCloud
Pros
- + MaxIOPS storage ranks #1 in disk benchmarks
- + 100% uptime SLA — they compensate
- + Strong European datacenter coverage including Helsinki and Warsaw
Cons
- - More expensive than Hetzner for equivalent specs
- - Fewer locations than Vultr
Cherry Servers
Pros
- + EU bare metal at competitive pricing
- + Hourly billing with API access
- + Lithuanian and Amsterdam locations
Cons
- - Small EU provider
- - Limited APAC presence
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.