Ultra Web Hosting vs Krystal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Ultra Web Hosting and Krystal.
Quick Verdict
3.2/5
Ultra Web Hosting
0 reviews
4.0/5
Krystal
0 reviews
Krystal is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.2). Seattle-based web host (since 2002) offering cPanel shared, WordPress, reseller and VPS hosting. Shared plans from $3.95 per month with a free domain on annual plans. Krystal is a UK hosting company running entirely on renewable energy. Shared, VPS, and reseller hosting. UK-focused with strong ethics, GDPR compliance, and Reforestation pledge per signup.
Ultra Web Hosting Hosting & reseller solutions | Krystal UK hosting powered by 100% renewable energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.2 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $3.95/mo✓ | From $7/mo |
| Best for | Small US businesses and freelancers wanting an owner-operated shared host with reachable support | UK and EU businesses, charities, agencies and resellers who want transparent resource allocations, real UK support and verifiable green credentials, plus a UK-anchored cloud with S3-compatible storage |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 10 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | 99.99%✓ |
| Data-center count | 1 | 3✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €7.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €3.50 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | London, United KingdomAmsterdam, NetherlandsNew York, United States |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | — | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Ultra Web Hosting → | Visit Krystal → | |
Ultra Web Hosting
Pros
- + 24 years in business, independently owned, hardware owned and racked in-house in Seattle/Tukwila
- + 99.9% uptime guarantee with pro-rated credits; daily backups kept 30 days; 45-day money-back
- + In-house US-based support with claimed 12-minute average first response, staffed near the hardware
- + Generous shared-plan bundle: cPanel, LiteSpeed, free SSL, free Cloudflare CDN, free migration
- + Green power claim with specifics (90%+ Seattle City Light hydroelectric) rather than vague offsets
Cons
- - Website contradicts itself on renewal pricing ($5.95 renewal vs 'renewal matches intro' vs $6.95 monthly)
- - Shared per-account resource allocations (CloudLinux LVE) are not published as spec numbers
- - Managed VPS spec (1 core, 2 GB, 50 GB) is modest for $49.95/mo next to the wider VPS market
- - Non-US locations from older company pages are unverified; current site centers on one facility
- - Independent review footprint is thin outside the company's own review widgets
Krystal
Pros
- + Shared plans publish real CPU and RAM allocations — rare at this price
- + Concrete SLA: 100% network availability with service credits, 99.99% cloud uptime target
- + Verified sustainability: B Corp, 1% for the Planet, ISO 27001, renewable-powered data centres
- + UK-based support with phone access and a 60-day money-back guarantee
- + Krystal Cloud adds per-second VMs, S3-compatible storage and T4/L4 GPUs in London, Amsterdam and New York
Cons
- - Priced well above budget shared hosts for comparable raw resources
- - UK-centred: shared hosting is London-only, no APAC regions
- - 24/7 emergency phone support only on the pricier plans
- - Inconsistent DDoS figures (4,000Gbps vs 2.0 Tbps) across its own pages
- - Unlimited storage and bandwidth are bounded by inode limits and fair use
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.