Ultra Web Hosting vs HostMonster
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Ultra Web Hosting and HostMonster.
Quick Verdict
3.2/5
Ultra Web Hosting
0 reviews
2.5/5
HostMonster
0 reviews
Ultra Web Hosting is rated higher (3.2 vs 2.5). Seattle-based web host (since 2002) offering cPanel shared, WordPress, reseller and VPS hosting. Shared plans from $3.95 per month with a free domain on annual plans. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.
Ultra Web Hosting Hosting & reseller solutions | HostMonster Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.2 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $3.95/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | Small US businesses and freelancers wanting an owner-operated shared host with reachable support | Existing HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Provo, Utah, US |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | — | us datacenter |
| Visit Ultra Web Hosting → | Visit HostMonster → | |
Ultra Web Hosting
Pros
- + 24 years in business, independently owned, hardware owned and racked in-house in Seattle/Tukwila
- + 99.9% uptime guarantee with pro-rated credits; daily backups kept 30 days; 45-day money-back
- + In-house US-based support with claimed 12-minute average first response, staffed near the hardware
- + Generous shared-plan bundle: cPanel, LiteSpeed, free SSL, free Cloudflare CDN, free migration
- + Green power claim with specifics (90%+ Seattle City Light hydroelectric) rather than vague offsets
Cons
- - Website contradicts itself on renewal pricing ($5.95 renewal vs 'renewal matches intro' vs $6.95 monthly)
- - Shared per-account resource allocations (CloudLinux LVE) are not published as spec numbers
- - Managed VPS spec (1 core, 2 GB, 50 GB) is modest for $49.95/mo next to the wider VPS market
- - Non-US locations from older company pages are unverified; current site centers on one facility
- - Independent review footprint is thin outside the company's own review widgets
HostMonster
Pros
- + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
- + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
- + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
- + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus
Cons
- - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
- - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
- - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
- - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
- - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.