tzulo vs Psychz Networks
A detailed comparison to help you choose between tzulo and Psychz Networks.
Quick Verdict
2.7/5
tzulo
0 reviews
3.6/5
Psychz Networks
0 reviews
Psychz Networks is rated higher (3.6 vs 2.7). Tzulo provides dedicated servers and virtual private servers with a focus on competitive pricing and fast deployment. Designed for developers, small businesses, and enterprises needing reliable hosting infrastructure. 16 cities (US: Los Angeles, Ashburn, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta; EU: Amsterdam, London, Barcelona; plus Moscow, Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei, Mumbai, Sydney, Sao Paulo, Johannesburg); DDoS mitigation packages up to 500 Gbps with 2-20 Gbps bundled free per dedicated server
tzulo Affordable dedicated servers with instant provisioning | Psychz Networks DDoS-protected bare metal, VPS, and colocation in 16 cities across the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.7 (0 reviews) | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | From $4/mo✓ |
| Best for | US colocation buyers and streaming workloads wanting unmetered transit and a small reachable team | Gaming, streaming, and media operators needing DDoS-heavy infrastructure or unusual reach (South America, Africa, South Asia), and anyone who wants a fully priced catalogue with hourly testing before committing. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU✓ | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | 16 GB✓ | 4 GB |
| Storage | 2,000 GB✓ | 50 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | 3 | 16✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €31.25 | €2.00✓ |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €7.81 | €1.00✓ |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Los Angeles, Ashburn, Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta, Amsterdam, London, Barcelona, Moscow, Tokyo, Seoul, Taipei, Mumbai, Sydney, Sao Paulo, Johannesburg |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenterwindows available |
| Visit tzulo → | Visit Psychz Networks → | |
tzulo
Pros
- + Operating since 2003 with its own ASN, IPv4/IPv6 blocks and five tier-1 transit providers
- + Cheap colocation: 1U from $50/mo with remote reboot PDU and no cross-connect fees
- + Month-to-month billing, free setup, free reboots/installs on all dedicated plans
- + Unusually explicit about what it does not offer (no SLA, no backups) — no fine-print surprises
- + Carrier-rich facilities: 30+ carriers in-house in Chicago, 100+ dark fibers in Los Angeles
Cons
- - No SLA of any kind — best-effort service is contractual policy, not a footnote
- - No backups and unmanaged by default: you own your data and your OS
- - Hardware lineup is several generations old (Xeon E3-1270v2, L5630) at mainstream prices
- - Unmetered 1 Gbit is shared with rate-limiting rights reserved; no documented DDoS mitigation
- - Cloud/VPS line sold out; dated site, ticket-only support, no self-serve API
Psychz Networks
Pros
- + Sixteen cities on four continents — Johannesburg, Sao Paulo, Mumbai, and Moscow on one account, which almost no competitor offers
- + DDoS mitigation is a core competency: bundled filtering on every dedicated server, tiers to 500 Gbps, fourteen scrubbing points, and remote protection via reverse proxy without needing an ASN
- + Public catalogue of 158 priced plans — no quote-form gate; VMs from $4/month and hourly from $0.0011
- + S3-compatible object storage with zero egress charges and immutable object lock included
- + Service commitment with real teeth: 99.9% network uptime and 5% credit per half hour of outage up to a full month's fee
- + Own facilities and network since 2014 (hosting since 2001) — an operating company, not a reseller shell
Cons
- - All payments non-refundable (continuous backup excepted); claims expire after one calendar year; Texas law with California arbitration
- - Usage policy reserves a discretionary takedown right over otherwise legal content; adult-content permission is a 2015 forum answer, not policy
- - Support and provisioning reviews are genuinely mixed despite the 15-minute response promise
- - Bandwidth is 'unmetered' under an unpublished fair-use threshold
- - EU footprint thinner than US/Asia; documentation and control panel are functional rather than polished
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.