tzulo vs iomart
A detailed comparison to help you choose between tzulo and iomart.
Quick Verdict
2.7/5
tzulo
0 reviews
3.4/5
iomart
0 reviews
iomart is rated higher (3.4 vs 2.7). Tzulo provides dedicated servers and virtual private servers with a focus on competitive pricing and fast deployment. Designed for developers, small businesses, and enterprises needing reliable hosting infrastructure. iOmart provides managed and unmanaged dedicated servers across UK and European data centers. Built for enterprises needing reliable hosting with local infrastructure and hands-on support.
tzulo Affordable dedicated servers with instant provisioning | iomart Enterprise dedicated servers with UK/EU data center options | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.7 (0 reviews) | 3.4 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | From $47.95/mo✓ |
| Best for | US colocation buyers and streaming workloads wanting unmetered transit and a small reachable team | UK and Ireland organisations needing data residency, owned infrastructure, and an accountable plc counterparty — regulated sectors, public sector via G-Cloud, and hybrid designs with UK DR requirements |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage | 2,000 GB✓ | 480 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | 3 | 12✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €31.25 | €11.99✓ |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €7.81 | €3.00✓ |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 12 wholly-owned UK sites (London, Glasgow, Manchester, Nottingham, Maidenhead, Gosport, ...) plus global PoPs |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit tzulo → | Visit iomart → | |
tzulo
Pros
- + Operating since 2003 with its own ASN, IPv4/IPv6 blocks and five tier-1 transit providers
- + Cheap colocation: 1U from $50/mo with remote reboot PDU and no cross-connect fees
- + Month-to-month billing, free setup, free reboots/installs on all dedicated plans
- + Unusually explicit about what it does not offer (no SLA, no backups) — no fine-print surprises
- + Carrier-rich facilities: 30+ carriers in-house in Chicago, 100+ dark fibers in Los Angeles
Cons
- - No SLA of any kind — best-effort service is contractual policy, not a footnote
- - No backups and unmanaged by default: you own your data and your OS
- - Hardware lineup is several generations old (Xeon E3-1270v2, L5630) at mainstream prices
- - Unmetered 1 Gbit is shared with rate-limiting rights reserved; no documented DDoS mitigation
- - Cloud/VPS line sold out; dated site, ticket-only support, no self-serve API
iomart
Pros
- + 12 wholly-owned UK data centres on ~2,500km of owned dark fibre — real data-residency and network control
- + 27-year track record as a listed plc; G-Cloud and Scottish Government framework supplier
- + 24/7 UK NOC with on-site hands at each facility; strong managed, backup, and DR heritage
- + RapidSwitch brand gives transparent month-to-month dedicated pricing from £47.95/mo with 24-hour deploy
- + Hybrid-friendly: direct cloud connectivity to Azure, AWS, and VMware platforms
Cons
- - iomart-branded managed and colocation services are quote-only with no public pricing
- - Brand sprawl (RapidSwitch, Easyspace, Backup Technology, Atech) makes contracts and support paths confusing
- - UK-centric owned estate — global PoPs are connectivity, not data centres; US option limited to RapidSwitch Dallas
- - Mixed facility tiers (some Tier 2 regional sites) mean resilience must be designed, not assumed
- - DDoS protection and backups are scoped services rather than standard inclusions
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.