tzulo vs HostKey
A detailed comparison to help you choose between tzulo and HostKey.
Quick Verdict
2.7/5
tzulo
0 reviews
3.1/5
HostKey
0 reviews
HostKey is rated higher (3.1 vs 2.7). Tzulo provides dedicated servers and virtual private servers with a focus on competitive pricing and fast deployment. Designed for developers, small businesses, and enterprises needing reliable hosting infrastructure. HostKey provides dedicated servers with GPU options in Netherlands and US. RTX and A100 GPU servers available for ML workloads. Custom hardware configurations and anti-DDoS.
tzulo Affordable dedicated servers with instant provisioning | HostKey GPU-enabled dedicated servers in EU and US | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.7 (0 reviews) | 3.1 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | From $40/mo✓ |
| Best for | US colocation buyers and streaming workloads wanting unmetered transit and a small reachable team | ML and rendering teams wanting dedicated GPU servers in the EU, and buyers who want bare metal with BYOIP and hourly billing at low cost |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 16 GB | — |
| Storage | 2,000 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | 3 | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €31.25 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €7.81 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Amsterdam NL, USA, Turkey, Finland (site also shows FR/DE/UK pickers and legacy RU listings) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectiongpu availableeu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit tzulo → | Visit HostKey → | |
tzulo
Pros
- + Operating since 2003 with its own ASN, IPv4/IPv6 blocks and five tier-1 transit providers
- + Cheap colocation: 1U from $50/mo with remote reboot PDU and no cross-connect fees
- + Month-to-month billing, free setup, free reboots/installs on all dedicated plans
- + Unusually explicit about what it does not offer (no SLA, no backups) — no fine-print surprises
- + Carrier-rich facilities: 30+ carriers in-house in Chicago, 100+ dark fibers in Los Angeles
Cons
- - No SLA of any kind — best-effort service is contractual policy, not a footnote
- - No backups and unmanaged by default: you own your data and your OS
- - Hardware lineup is several generations old (Xeon E3-1270v2, L5630) at mainstream prices
- - Unmetered 1 Gbit is shared with rate-limiting rights reserved; no documented DDoS mitigation
- - Cloud/VPS line sold out; dated site, ticket-only support, no self-serve API
HostKey
Pros
- + GPU pricing is competitive: RTX-class bare metal from €118/mo, GPU VPS from €70/mo, A100/H100 available
- + Cheap bare-metal entry at €40/mo with IPMI/iDRAC and unmetered 1 Gbps on advanced NL servers
- + Hourly and monthly billing on instant servers — rare for dedicated hardware
- + BYOIP/AS announcement free on the instant EPYC line; custom builds up to 190 cores and 4.6TB DDR5
- + Amsterdam base with EU data residency plus US and Turkey options
Cons
- - No published uptime SLA percentage or credit schedule
- - Small provider: thin documentation, sales-led quotes, and listings that mix hardware eras
- - Footprint beyond Amsterdam is thin; no multi-region story
- - Mixed pricing currencies (euro lists, dollar tiers) and 'from' prices that require confirmation
- - Backups and snapshots are add-ons; no free tier
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.