tzulo vs Constant (Choopa)
A detailed comparison to help you choose between tzulo and Constant (Choopa).
Quick Verdict
2.7/5
tzulo
0 reviews
3.6/5
Constant (Choopa)
0 reviews
Constant (Choopa) is rated higher (3.6 vs 2.7). Tzulo provides dedicated servers and virtual private servers with a focus on competitive pricing and fast deployment. Designed for developers, small businesses, and enterprises needing reliable hosting infrastructure. Constant provides dedicated servers with customizable hardware, DDoS protection, and 24/7 support. Built for applications requiring guaranteed resources and low latency.
tzulo Affordable dedicated servers with instant provisioning | Constant (Choopa) Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 2.7 (0 reviews) | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $125/mo | From $120/mo✓ |
| Best for | US colocation buyers and streaming workloads wanting unmetered transit and a small reachable team | Teams wanting a single API and bill across global regions for mixed VM, bare metal, and GPU capacity, with an SLA strong enough for production |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 4 vCPU | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB✓ |
| Storage | 2,000 GB✓ | 480 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 5 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 100% |
| Data-center count | 3 | 33✓ |
| €/vCPU/mo | €31.25 | €30.00✓ |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €7.81 | €3.75✓ |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | 33 regions on six continents (list in specs) |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionus datacenterapac datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit tzulo → | Visit Constant (Choopa) → | |
tzulo
Pros
- + Operating since 2003 with its own ASN, IPv4/IPv6 blocks and five tier-1 transit providers
- + Cheap colocation: 1U from $50/mo with remote reboot PDU and no cross-connect fees
- + Month-to-month billing, free setup, free reboots/installs on all dedicated plans
- + Unusually explicit about what it does not offer (no SLA, no backups) — no fine-print surprises
- + Carrier-rich facilities: 30+ carriers in-house in Chicago, 100+ dark fibers in Los Angeles
Cons
- - No SLA of any kind — best-effort service is contractual policy, not a footnote
- - No backups and unmanaged by default: you own your data and your OS
- - Hardware lineup is several generations old (Xeon E3-1270v2, L5630) at mainstream prices
- - Unmetered 1 Gbit is shared with rate-limiting rights reserved; no documented DDoS mitigation
- - Cloud/VPS line sold out; dated site, ticket-only support, no self-serve API
Constant (Choopa)
Pros
- + One platform across 33 regions: VMs, bare metal, GPU clusters, storage, managed databases, Kubernetes
- + Credit-backed 100% uptime SLA covering network and host node — stronger than most rivals on paper
- + Public, consistent pricing with hourly billing capped at 672 hours/month; mature API, CLI, Terraform support
- + Real bare metal range from 4-core E3 boxes to 128-core EPYC and 8-way H100/B200 GPU systems
- + BGP sessions with full tables, BYOIP, IPv6 in every region, free Anycast DNS
Cons
- - The brand in this listing is retired — Choopa was folded into Vultr in 2022 and no longer sells under its own name
- - Bare metal entry (~$120/mo) costs more than European specialists for comparable-era hardware
- - DDoS filtering beyond built-in mitigation is a $10/mo per-instance add-on; snapshots and backups also cost extra
- - Ticket-based big-platform support rather than the named-account service old Choopa customers knew
- - Billing edge cases: stopped instances can still bill on some lines, and percentage-based backups add up
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.