Twingate vs ZeroTier
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Twingate and ZeroTier.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Twingate
0 reviews
3.7/5
ZeroTier
0 reviews
Twingate is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.7). Fast TLS-based tunnels with SSO integration — Twingate does not use WireGuard. ZeroTier creates virtual Ethernet networks over the internet. Connect servers, VMs, and devices as if on the same LAN. Personal plan is free for 10 devices (non-commercial). SDN-based layer-2 architecture.
Twingate Zero trust network access — replaces VPN | ZeroTier Virtual networking — Ethernet over the internet | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Engineering teams replacing a corporate VPN with per-resource zero trust access, managed as code | Homelab operators, LAN-dependent software, and device-heavy, user-light fleets that need a flat virtual Ethernet network |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssomobile app | free tieropen sourceapi access |
| Visit Twingate → | Visit ZeroTier → | |
Twingate
Pros
- + Genuinely free Starter tier for up to 5 users — not a trial, with 50 Resources and 10 networks
- + Outbound-only connectors: no open inbound ports, no bastion hosts, no published IPs to scan
- + Policy depth: device posture, WebAuthn MFA, SCIM, just-in-time and usage-based access
- + Public component-level status page, documented relay redundancy, published incident write-ups
- + Terraform, Pulumi, Helm and Docker deployment paths — access managed as code
Cons
- - SaaS control plane holds your access policy — disqualifying for fully self-hosted mandates
- - Not an internet VPN; per-resource model requires disciplined resource inventory
- - Geoblocking, static IPs and privileged access are Enterprise-only; DNS filtering is an add-on
- - Per-seat pricing scales linearly and gets expensive with many contractors or seasonal staff
- - Contractual SLAs are custom/Enterprise-only; the 99.99% figure is a reliability claim, not an SLA
ZeroTier
Pros
- + True layer-2 virtual Ethernet: broadcast and multicast work, unlike WireGuard-based overlays
- + Free Personal plan covers a 10-device homelab with no time limit
- + Native IPv6 support with RFC 4193, 6PLANE /80 delegation and public prefix routing
- + Lightweight agents (under 16 MB memory) with broad platform support including MikroTik and Docker
- + Direct peer-to-peer paths keep traffic off vendor infrastructure when NAT traversal succeeds
Cons
- - Free tier shrank to 10 devices, one network, non-commercial only; no API without a paid plan
- - No forward secrecy in its Salsa20/Poly1305 protocol, unlike WireGuard-based rivals
- - Since v1.16 the controller is non-commercial source-available; commercial self-hosting means Enterprise
- - Relayed fallback traffic is slow, and paid Premium Relays are still listed as coming soon
- - Monthly-only, non-refundable subscriptions with configuration lockout if payment lapses
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.