Twingate vs Pritunl
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Twingate and Pritunl.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Twingate
0 reviews
4.0/5
Pritunl
0 reviews
Both Twingate and Pritunl are equally rated at 4.0/5. Fast TLS-based tunnels with SSO integration — Twingate does not use WireGuard. Pritunl is a self-hosted VPN solution offering user management, multi-protocol support (OpenVPN, WireGuard), and single sign-on capabilities. Built for teams needing controlled network access without vendor lock-in.
Twingate Zero trust network access — replaces VPN | Pritunl Open-source VPN server with centralized management and SSO integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Engineering teams replacing a corporate VPN with per-resource zero trust access, managed as code | Teams with Linux operations skills that need self-hosted remote access with SSO, audit logs, and full control over where traffic flows. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssomobile app | free tieropen sourceself hostableteam featuressso |
| Visit Twingate → | Visit Pritunl → | |
Twingate
Pros
- + Genuinely free Starter tier for up to 5 users — not a trial, with 50 Resources and 10 networks
- + Outbound-only connectors: no open inbound ports, no bastion hosts, no published IPs to scan
- + Policy depth: device posture, WebAuthn MFA, SCIM, just-in-time and usage-based access
- + Public component-level status page, documented relay redundancy, published incident write-ups
- + Terraform, Pulumi, Helm and Docker deployment paths — access managed as code
Cons
- - SaaS control plane holds your access policy — disqualifying for fully self-hosted mandates
- - Not an internet VPN; per-resource model requires disciplined resource inventory
- - Geoblocking, static IPs and privileged access are Enterprise-only; DNS filtering is an add-on
- - Per-seat pricing scales linearly and gets expensive with many contractors or seasonal staff
- - Contractual SLAs are custom/Enterprise-only; the 99.99% figure is a reliability claim, not an SLA
Pritunl
Pros
- + Free Community tier with a single server and unlimited users — usable without registration or a credit card
- + Per-server pricing with unlimited users keeps licensing flat as teams grow
- + Real identity integration: SSO providers, LDAP/Active Directory/OAuth sources, TOTP and push second factors
- + Security engineering beyond the category norm: SELinux policies, TPM and Apple Secure Enclave device attestation, dynamic firewall
- + Both OpenVPN and WireGuard clients, plus WireGuard/IPsec site-to-site links and multi-cloud VPC peering
- + All source code public on GitHub since 2013 — auditable and customizable via the Python plugin system
Cons
- - SSO, failover clustering, and site-to-site links are gated behind the $70/month Enterprise tier
- - Self-hosting means you own patching, MongoDB operations, certificate rotation, and incident response
- - No vendor SLA or published support response guarantees in the documentation we reviewed
- - MongoDB becomes part of the VPN trust boundary and needs its own hardening
- - Scale claims (thousands of concurrent users) are vendor statements we could not verify independently
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.