Twingate vs Netmaker
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Twingate and Netmaker.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Twingate
0 reviews
3.6/5
Netmaker
0 reviews
Twingate is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.6). Fast TLS-based tunnels with SSO integration — Twingate does not use WireGuard. Netmaker is an open source platform for creating and managing WireGuard virtual networks. Self-hosted on your infrastructure. More feature-rich than raw WireGuard with a dashboard and ACL management.
Twingate Zero trust network access — replaces VPN | Netmaker Self-hosted WireGuard network management | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Engineering teams replacing a corporate VPN with per-resource zero trust access, managed as code | DevOps teams that want self-hosted WireGuard mesh networking with a dashboard, ACLs, and site-to-site links under their own control |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresssomobile app | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Twingate → | Visit Netmaker → | |
Twingate
Pros
- + Genuinely free Starter tier for up to 5 users — not a trial, with 50 Resources and 10 networks
- + Outbound-only connectors: no open inbound ports, no bastion hosts, no published IPs to scan
- + Policy depth: device posture, WebAuthn MFA, SCIM, just-in-time and usage-based access
- + Public component-level status page, documented relay redundancy, published incident write-ups
- + Terraform, Pulumi, Helm and Docker deployment paths — access managed as code
Cons
- - SaaS control plane holds your access policy — disqualifying for fully self-hosted mandates
- - Not an internet VPN; per-resource model requires disciplined resource inventory
- - Geoblocking, static IPs and privileged access are Enterprise-only; DNS filtering is an add-on
- - Per-seat pricing scales linearly and gets expensive with many contractors or seasonal staff
- - Contractual SLAs are custom/Enterprise-only; the 99.99% figure is a reliability claim, not an SLA
Netmaker
Pros
- + Free community tier is unlimited — self-hosted, Apache 2.0, unlimited networks and devices
- + Per-active-connection billing with hourly proration instead of idle seat licenses
- + Peer-to-peer WireGuard mesh keeps traffic off a central bottleneck; relay and egress gateways cover hard NAT cases
- + Deployment choice: fully self-hosted, Netmaker Cloud, or fully managed by their team
- + Dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 networks, private DNS, OAuth, ACLs; SCIM/SIEM/traffic logs on Business
Cons
- - Very small vendor (single-digit headcount, ~$2.8M raised) behind a critical-path product
- - Pricing page mixes current per-connection rates with legacy platform/network fees and a $99/month plan — billing basis is ambiguous
- - Community tier is community-supported only; SLAs are Enterprise-only
- - Self-hosting the server adds operational overhead (upgrades, database, TLS, monitoring)
- - Native mobile meshing not supported — phones connect via gateway and the standard WireGuard app
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.