Trigger.dev vs Lagon
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Trigger.dev and Lagon.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Trigger.dev
0 reviews
2.0/5
Lagon
0 reviews
Trigger.dev is rated higher (4.0 vs 2.0). Trigger.dev is an open-source background job and workflow platform for TypeScript developers. Run long tasks, cron jobs, and event-driven workflows. Self-hostable or cloud. Lagon is a free, open source serverless runtime for JavaScript/TypeScript that can be self-hosted or used via their cloud. Cloudflare Workers-compatible API.
Trigger.dev Open-source background jobs for TypeScript | Lagon Open source Cloudflare Workers alternative | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | TypeScript teams running work that exceeds serverless timeouts — AI agent loops with human approval steps, long LLM chains, media/document processing and multi-tenant background jobs with per-tenant concurrency. | Nobody as a hosted platform; self-hosters, researchers and forkers who want an AGPL-3.0 Rust/V8 edge-runtime codebase and are prepared to maintain it |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Trigger.dev → | Visit Lagon → | |
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + No-timeout task execution with checkpointed waits that bill nothing and hold no concurrency slot
- + Apache 2.0 licensed with a documented Docker self-hosting path — real escape hatch from the cloud pricing
- + Fully published rate card: monthly tiers as credits, per-second compute by machine size, per-run fee
- + TypeScript-first DX: tasks in your repo, versioned atomic deploys, replay-from-failure, OpenTelemetry on every run
- + Generous free tier ($5/month credits, 20 concurrent runs, unlimited tasks) for evaluation and side projects
Cons
- - Pro overages stack fast (seats $20/month above 25; concurrency, schedules, branches and connections all metered)
- - Hobby has no overage path — hitting a ceiling forces the jump to the $50 plan
- - Compliance features (SOC 2 report, SSO, RBAC, pentest report) are Enterprise-gated; no published uptime SLA on cloud plans
- - TypeScript/Node-centric; no no-code surface and thin support for other runtimes
- - Young vendor with a shifting product identity; docs and community content span multiple product generations
Lagon
Pros
- + Genuinely open source (AGPL-3.0) with a self-hostable full stack
- + Sound architecture: Rust runtime on V8 isolates with WinterCG-style Web APIs
- + Everything an edge platform needs was in the box: CLI, cron triggers, custom domains, rollback, logs
- + Free while it existed — no bill to model
- + The team and technology now sit inside Vercel, so the ideas live on
Cons
- - Discontinued: acquired by Vercel, cloud shut down, repo archived March 2026
- - Never left alpha — breaking changes and missing features were documented by the project itself
- - No SLA, no published pricing, no support channel
- - lagon.app still advertises a live product with no shutdown notice
- - Self-hosting an unmaintained V8-based runtime is a security liability
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.