Trigger.dev vs Cloudflare Workers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Trigger.dev and Cloudflare Workers.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Trigger.dev
0 reviews
4.3/5
Cloudflare Workers
0 reviews
Cloudflare Workers is rated higher (4.3 vs 4.0). Trigger.dev is an open-source background job and workflow platform for TypeScript developers. Run long tasks, cron jobs, and event-driven workflows. Self-hostable or cloud. Run JavaScript, Python, and Rust functions at the edge with sub-millisecond latency. Ideal for APIs, middleware, and full-stack applications needing global distribution.
Trigger.dev Open-source background jobs for TypeScript | Cloudflare Workers Deploy serverless code globally on Cloudflare's edge network | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews) | 4.3 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript teams running work that exceeds serverless timeouts — AI agent loops with human approval steps, long LLM chains, media/document processing and multi-tenant background jobs with per-tenant concurrency. | Latency-sensitive APIs, middleware, edge rendering and full-stack applications that want global deployment with no infrastructure to run — especially teams already using Cloudflare's storage and CDN products. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | 10 vCPU✓ |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | — | 1 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | 100% |
| Data-center count | — | 330 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Global — 300+ cities |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tierddos protectionipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit Trigger.dev → | Visit Cloudflare Workers → | |
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + No-timeout task execution with checkpointed waits that bill nothing and hold no concurrency slot
- + Apache 2.0 licensed with a documented Docker self-hosting path — real escape hatch from the cloud pricing
- + Fully published rate card: monthly tiers as credits, per-second compute by machine size, per-run fee
- + TypeScript-first DX: tasks in your repo, versioned atomic deploys, replay-from-failure, OpenTelemetry on every run
- + Generous free tier ($5/month credits, 20 concurrent runs, unlimited tasks) for evaluation and side projects
Cons
- - Pro overages stack fast (seats $20/month above 25; concurrency, schedules, branches and connections all metered)
- - Hobby has no overage path — hitting a ceiling forces the jump to the $50 plan
- - Compliance features (SOC 2 report, SSO, RBAC, pentest report) are Enterprise-gated; no published uptime SLA on cloud plans
- - TypeScript/Node-centric; no no-code surface and thin support for other runtimes
- - Young vendor with a shifting product identity; docs and community content span multiple product generations
Cloudflare Workers
Pros
- + No cold starts: V8 isolates start in microseconds at 330+ locations
- + CPU-time billing with a genuinely usable free tier (100k requests/day)
- + No egress or bandwidth charges on any plan
- + Storage stack (KV, D1, Durable Objects, R2) binds declaratively and stays in-network
- + Strong docs: pricing and limits pages are explicit and example-driven
Cons
- - CPU time caps exclude compute-heavy and long-running workloads
- - Real vendor lock-in through Durable Objects, bindings and deployment model
- - KV writes ($5.00/M) and Durable Objects duration billing surprise stateful designs
- - Conceptual shift for teams used to container-based serverless
- - No uptime SLA below the Business plan
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.