Trigger.dev vs Azion
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Trigger.dev and Azion.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Trigger.dev
0 reviews
3.7/5
Azion
0 reviews
Trigger.dev is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.7). Trigger.dev is an open-source background job and workflow platform for TypeScript developers. Run long tasks, cron jobs, and event-driven workflows. Self-hostable or cloud. Azion is a full edge computing platform with 100+ global PoPs. Edge Functions, Edge SQL, Edge Storage, and DDoS protection. Founded in Brazil with strong Latin American coverage.
Trigger.dev Open-source background jobs for TypeScript | Azion Edge platform with 100+ PoPs — Brazil-founded | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript teams running work that exceeds serverless timeouts — AI agent loops with human approval steps, long LLM chains, media/document processing and multi-tenant background jobs with per-tenant concurrency. | LatAm-focused content, commerce, and API delivery teams wanting CDN + WAF + edge functions from one platform with published pricing |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | — | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Trigger.dev → | Visit Azion → | |
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + No-timeout task execution with checkpointed waits that bill nothing and hold no concurrency slot
- + Apache 2.0 licensed with a documented Docker self-hosting path — real escape hatch from the cloud pricing
- + Fully published rate card: monthly tiers as credits, per-second compute by machine size, per-run fee
- + TypeScript-first DX: tasks in your repo, versioned atomic deploys, replay-from-failure, OpenTelemetry on every run
- + Generous free tier ($5/month credits, 20 concurrent runs, unlimited tasks) for evaluation and side projects
Cons
- - Pro overages stack fast (seats $20/month above 25; concurrency, schedules, branches and connections all metered)
- - Hobby has no overage path — hitting a ceiling forces the jump to the $50 plan
- - Compliance features (SOC 2 report, SSO, RBAC, pentest report) are Enterprise-gated; no published uptime SLA on cloud plans
- - TypeScript/Node-centric; no no-code surface and thin support for other runtimes
- - Young vendor with a shifting product identity; docs and community content span multiple product generations
Azion
Pros
- + Strong Latin American footprint — the network was built for Brazil/LatAm first
- + Full stack at the edge: CDN, edge functions, WAF, DDoS, DNS, object storage in one platform
- + Real free tier (Hobby) plus $300 credit for 365 days without a credit card
- + DDoS protection and Network Shield included with the Firewall at no extra charge
- + All on-demand per-metric prices published, with tiered volume discounts
Cons
- - Small community and thin third-party ecosystem versus Cloudflare
- - Fragmented pricing across many metrics and four regional tiers
- - JavaScript-only edge runtime; SQL/KV stores and AI inference are preview
- - SLA credits are capped (25% max) and require customer-run third-party monitoring
- - No VMs, bare metal, or rentable GPUs
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.