Traefik vs Quay.io
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Traefik and Quay.io.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
Traefik
0 reviews
3.7/5
Quay.io
0 reviews
Traefik is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.7). Traefik is a cloud-native reverse proxy and load balancer designed for microservices and Kubernetes. Auto-discovers services from Docker, K8s, and Consul. Automatic Let's Encrypt. Red Hat's hosted container image registry: unlimited free public repos, per-private-repository pricing from $15/month, automatic Clair v4 CVE scanning, robot accounts, teams, and exportable audit logs.
Traefik Cloud-native reverse proxy for microservices | Quay.io Hosted container registry from Red Hat: free public repos, CVE scanning, per-private-repo pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Docker and Kubernetes teams who want TLS, routing and service discovery with minimal configuration work — especially platform teams standardizing on Kubernetes ingress and Gateway API. | Open-source projects needing free public image hosting, and Red Hat-centric enterprises wanting managed registries with SSO, robot accounts and audit logging |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostablekubernetes support | free tierteam featuresssoapi access |
| Visit Traefik → | Visit Quay.io → | |
Traefik
Pros
- + MIT-licensed proxy with the full feature set free for commercial use — no per-service or seat charges
- + Auto service discovery from Docker, Kubernetes, Consul and others with hot-reloaded dynamic configuration
- + Automatic Let's Encrypt TLS across many hostnames, HTTP/2-3, gRPC, WebSockets, TCP/UDP routing
- + Built-in observability: Prometheus/Datadog/StatsD metrics, OpenTelemetry tracing, dashboard and API
- + Long production track record since 2016, active v3.x releases, Gateway API leadership, plugin catalog (Go + WebAssembly)
Cons
- - Commercial Hub tiers are sales-gated with no public pricing; marketplace contracts run $30,000-$50,000/year
- - Advanced auth (OIDC/JWT/OPA), WAF, multi-cluster and FIPS live behind the paid line
- - Dynamic-discovery debugging (middleware ordering, provider state) has a real learning curve
- - No vendor-published benchmarks and no uptime SLA for Hub's managed components
- - Small vendor behind the commercial product; EULA includes license-key verification for paid installs
Quay.io
Pros
- + Unlimited free public repositories with automatic CVE scanning on every push
- + Public, predictable per-repository pricing from $15/month for 5 private repos
- + Robot accounts, team permissions, SSO and exportable audit logs aimed at compliance teams
- + Decade-plus production track record (launched 2013) with a supported upgrade path to self-managed Red Hat Quay
- + Full API, image rollback, zero-downtime garbage collection and Git build triggers
Cons
- - Per-repository billing punishes micro-repo layouts; large tiers get expensive fast
- - No published uptime SLA for the hosted service
- - Clair does not cover every language ecosystem, and remediation is entirely on the customer
- - Free tier fair-use caps (100 GB storage, 1 TB egress) are enforceable quotas
- - Overlapping product lineup (Quay.io vs Red Hat Quay vs OpenShift Platform Plus) complicates buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.