TMDHosting vs HostMonster
A detailed comparison to help you choose between TMDHosting and HostMonster.
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
TMDHosting
0 reviews
2.5/5
HostMonster
0 reviews
TMDHosting is rated higher (3.6 vs 2.5). TMDHosting offers fully managed shared hosting with SSD storage across 9 global datacenter locations. Free migrations, free domain and SSL; daily backups only from the Business tier up. US-based company (Orlando, Florida), operating since 2007. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.
TMDHosting Managed SSD shared hosting in 9 global locations | HostMonster Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $9.52/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | Small businesses and non-technical site owners who want managed hosting with real human support — especially with audiences in Asia-Pacific, Africa or South America where the datacenter choice matters. | Existing HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | — | — |
| Storage | 50 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 9 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Chicago, London, Amsterdam, Tokyo, Singapore, Sydney, Johannesburg, Mumbai, Santiago | Provo, Utah, US |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | backups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | us datacenter |
| Visit TMDHosting → | Visit HostMonster → | |
TMDHosting
Pros
- + Nine datacenters across five continents with published speed-test IPs — unusual breadth for budget-class hosting
- + Honest pricing structure: flat 20% term discount and roughly 25% at renewal instead of 3-4x renewal markup
- + Fully managed with free human migration and a published 15-minute support response target, 24/7/365
- + Solid shared stack: LiteSpeed + cache, all-SSD RAID-10, CloudLinux isolation, cPanel, Softaculous, SpamExperts
- + Business tier (unlimited sites, 100 GB SSD, 30 backup copies at $12.72/month) is genuinely well-equipped
Cons
- - Starter plan ($9.52/month, 50 GB SSD) includes no backups at all despite older marketing claims
- - Entry pricing is well above pure budget hosts for comparable resources — you pay for management
- - 99.9% uptime advertised without a published service-credit formula (99.99% claim on VPS line)
- - Site copy is internally inconsistent (6 vs 9 datacenters, 30 vs 60-day guarantee claims in the wild)
- - Third-party feedback on support quality is positive on speed but mixed on technical depth
HostMonster
Pros
- + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
- + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
- + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
- + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus
Cons
- - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
- - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
- - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
- - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
- - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.