Skip to content

TigerData vs Turso

A detailed comparison to help you choose between TigerData and Turso.

Quick Verdict

4.2/5

TigerData

0 reviews

4.1/5

Turso

0 reviews

TigerData is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). TigerData, from the creators of TimescaleDB, is a PostgreSQL cloud platform built for time-series and real-time analytics workloads at large scale, aimed at developers and enterprises. Turso offers SQLite-based databases at the edge for multi-tenant SaaS. Create thousands of database instances, each at a different edge location. Per-tenant isolation at SQLite pricing.

TigerData

TigerData

PostgreSQL-native time-series database for metrics, events, and analytics

Turso

Turso

Edge SQLite — create thousands of DB instances

Overview
Rating4.2 (0 reviews)✓4.1 (0 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFrom $30/moFree tier available✓
Best forTeams building observability, IoT/telemetry, financial or real-time analytics platforms who want time-series performance inside standard PostgreSQL and can run the ops model of a managed Postgres service.Multi-tenant SaaS and AI agent workloads needing per-tenant SQLite databases replicated close to users
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM——
Storage—5 GB
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.9%—
Data-center count1730✓
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots✓
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier✓
Data-center locations
Regions
13 AWS regions + 4 Azure regions across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and South America
—
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi accessopen source
free tierapi accessopen source
Visit TigerData →Visit Turso →

TigerData

Pros

  • + Full SQL and the PostgreSQL extension ecosystem — hypertables, continuous aggregates and 90%+ compression without a new query language
  • + Published consumption pricing (compute from $30/month, storage $0.177-0.212/GB-month) with hourly metering and no instance-size lock-in
  • + 17 regions across AWS and Azure with EU, US and APAC residency selectable at creation
  • + Reliability productized: multi-AZ HA, PITR up to 14 days, backup retention to 180 days, cross-region restore, public SLA and status page
  • + Open-source TimescaleDB escape hatch — self-hosting stays viable, which keeps pricing honest

Cons

  • - Hourly compute meter bills full hours and forgotten scale-ups at the higher config are expensive
  • - Serious reliability and security features (multi-node HA, 14-day PITR, SOC 2, private endpoints) gated behind Scale or Enterprise
  • - PostgreSQL and time-series concepts (chunks, compression/retention policies) assumed — not a zero-ops database for non-database teams
  • - Effective storage price assumes 5x compression; actual ratios are workload-dependent
  • - Aiven-partnered legacy MST product carries a different (99.99%) SLA — easy to confuse with Tiger Cloud
View full TigerDatareview →

Turso

Pros

  • + True per-tenant database isolation at SQLite pricing — 100 databases free, unlimited from $5.99/mo
  • + Published pricing, overage rates, and even per-tier commit latency — rare transparency
  • + Edge replication across 30+ locations with placement you control per database
  • + Eleven-nines durability via S3-backed commits; MIT-licensed engine you can self-host
  • + SQLite file-format and SQL compatibility keeps local dev and production aligned

Cons

  • - No public uptime SLA on self-serve plans — the guarantee is durability, not availability
  • - Rows-read metering punishes unindexed queries; costs can surprise the careless
  • - EU databases still back up to S3 us-east-2 unless you bring your own buckets (Pro+)
  • - SQLite dialect limits rule out query-heavy relational workloads
  • - Big price jump from Scaler ($29/mo) to Pro ($499/mo) for priority support and compliance
View full Tursoreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.