Tigris vs PocketBase
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tigris and PocketBase.
Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | PocketBase Open source backend in a single file | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (108 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (188 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform | Developers who want the simplest possible backend for small apps and prototypes in a single binary |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostable |
| Visit Tigris → | Visit PocketBase → | |
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
PocketBase
Pros
- + Single binary — extremely simple to deploy
- + Embedded SQLite — no separate database
- + Real-time subscriptions built-in
Cons
- - SQLite — not suitable for multi-writer high-concurrency
- - Single file limits horizontal scaling
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.