Tigris vs CockroachDB
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tigris and CockroachDB.
Quick Verdict
4.8/5
Tigris
108 reviews
4.4/5
CockroachDB
357 reviews
Tigris is rated higher (4.8 vs 4.4). Tigris is a serverless NoSQL database with built-in search and S3-compatible object storage. Global distribution, no connection pools needed, and developer-first design. Used on Fly.io. CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built to survive datacenter failures. Postgres-compatible, strong consistency, and automatic scaling across regions. Serverless and dedicated options.
Tigris Globally distributed database built for modern apps | CockroachDB Distributed SQL database that survives failures | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (108 reviews)✓ | 4.4 (357 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Fly.io users and serverless developers who want database, search, and object storage from a single platform | Applications requiring high availability across multiple regions where database availability is mission-critical |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Tigris → | Visit CockroachDB → | |
Tigris
Pros
- + Database + search + object storage in one API
- + No connection pools needed
- + Global distribution built-in
Cons
- - Newer platform — smaller community
- - Less mature than MongoDB Atlas
CockroachDB
Pros
- + Survives datacenter failures by design
- + Postgres-compatible SQL
- + Automatic geographic distribution
Cons
- - More complex than standard Postgres
- - Free tier limits apply
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.