Skip to content

TensorDock vs AWS EC2

A detailed comparison to help you choose between TensorDock and AWS EC2.

Quick Verdict

3.8/5

TensorDock

0 reviews

3.9/5

AWS EC2

0 reviews

AWS EC2 is rated higher (3.9 vs 3.8). TensorDock is a GPU compute marketplace with per-second billing — H100 SXM5 from $2.80/hour and A100 from $1.50/hour (A100 PCIe 80GB) on its published rate card. 100+ locations in 20+ countries, on-demand provisioning. 124 Availability Zones in 39 geographic regions

TensorDock

TensorDock

Affordable GPU cloud compute without long-term contracts

AWS EC2

AWS EC2

The original cloud — 750+ instance types

Overview
Rating3.8 (0 reviews)3.9 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelusage-basedusage-based (per-second On-Demand, Spot, Savings Plans; free tier credits for new accounts)
Starting priceFrom $0.1/moFrom $0.0042/mo✓
Best forCost-conscious ML engineers, researchers and studios running training with checkpointing, batch inference or rendering, especially where consumer GPUs like the RTX 4090 fit the workloadTeams with AWS expertise needing the broadest instance selection, global regions, GPU/bare metal options, and commitment-based discounts for steady production workloads
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores2 vCPU—
RAM4 GB✓0.5 GB
Storage20 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.99%99.99%
Data-center count100—
€/vCPU/mo€0.05—
€/GB RAM/mo€0.03€0.01✓
Features
IPv6✓
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier✓
Data-center locations
Regions
100+ marketplace locations in over 20 countries (US, EU, Asia-Pacific); tier 3/4 data centers plus community hosts
39 AWS regions / 124 AZs plus Local Zones and Wavelength
Tags
Tags
hourly billinggpu availableeu datacenterus datacenter
free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionbackups includedmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessterraform providerkubernetes support
Visit TensorDock →Visit AWS EC2 →

TensorDock

Pros

  • + Among the lowest published GPU rates anywhere: RTX 4090 at $0.35/hr, H100 SXM5 at $2.85/hr typical
  • + A la carte, per-second billing for vCPU, RAM and NVMe — pay only for the configuration you need
  • + Breadth: 45 GPU models across 100+ locations in 20+ countries, with an API for automation
  • + Published rate card and transparent explanation of why the same GPU has multiple prices
  • + Host vetting, host SSH access revoked, and a 99.99% uptime standard for listed hosts

Cons

  • - Marketplace variance: host redundancy and quality differ, with cheaper listings often least redundant
  • - Email-only support with multi-hour response windows; no contractual SLA with credits
  • - Prepaid balance model deletes servers when the balance reaches zero
  • - Published rate card is stamped July 2024 and carries a no-guarantee disclaimer
  • - Fewer managed niceties (templates, serverless) than RunPod, Lambda or hyperscalers
View full TensorDockreview →

AWS EC2

Pros

  • + Widest hardware catalog in the market — 1,000+ instance types including Arm, bare metal and GPU families
  • + Per-second billing with real cost levers: Spot up to 90% off, Savings Plans up to 72% off
  • + 99.99% region-level SLA across 124 AZs in 39 regions with explicit service credits
  • + Mature ecosystem: AMIs, Marketplace, Terraform, Systems Manager, and deep service integration

Cons

  • - Total cost is a system of meters — EBS, snapshots, elastic IPv4, data transfer and add-ons dwarf the instance price
  • - Requires real AWS expertise: VPC design, security groups, IAM and patching are all self-managed
  • - Single-instance SLA is only 99.5%; the 99.99% commitment requires multi-AZ architecture
  • - Data transfer out is expensive enough to shape architecture decisions
View full AWS EC2review →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.