Tailscale vs Netmaker
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tailscale and Netmaker.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
Tailscale
0 reviews
3.6/5
Netmaker
0 reviews
Tailscale is rated higher (4.1 vs 3.6). Tailscale creates a private WireGuard mesh between all your servers and devices with zero config. Works through firewalls and NAT. Free Personal plan for non-commercial use: up to 6 users with unlimited user devices. Netmaker is an open source platform for creating and managing WireGuard virtual networks. Self-hosted on your infrastructure. More feature-rich than raw WireGuard with a dashboard and ACL management.
Tailscale Zero-config WireGuard mesh VPN for your infra | Netmaker Self-hosted WireGuard network management | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers and small teams running servers across multiple providers who want secure mesh connectivity without managing bastions, VPN concentrators or firewall rules | DevOps teams that want self-hosted WireGuard mesh networking with a dashboard, ACLs, and site-to-site links under their own control |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceapi accessteam features | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Tailscale → | Visit Netmaker → | |
Tailscale
Pros
- + Near-zero-config WireGuard mesh: devices connect peer-to-peer through NAT with no firewall surgery
- + Free forever for non-commercial use (up to 6 users, unlimited user devices)
- + Seat-based billing is predictable; invited-but-inactive users do not occupy seats
- + Full IPv6 support inside the tailnet plus IPv4/IPv6 interoperability via relays
- + Open-source clients; self-hostable control plane (Headscale) exists for the trust-constrained
Cons
- - Proprietary hosted control plane coordinates key exchange and sees network metadata
- - Not a privacy VPN — anonymous internet exit is an add-on or your own exit node
- - SLA-backed support is a paid add-on package on every plan, including Premium
- - Tagged-resource and ephemeral-minute meters can raise the bill for Kubernetes-heavy fleets
- - Seat overage auto-charges and is not refunded when seats are reduced afterwards
Netmaker
Pros
- + Free community tier is unlimited — self-hosted, Apache 2.0, unlimited networks and devices
- + Per-active-connection billing with hourly proration instead of idle seat licenses
- + Peer-to-peer WireGuard mesh keeps traffic off a central bottleneck; relay and egress gateways cover hard NAT cases
- + Deployment choice: fully self-hosted, Netmaker Cloud, or fully managed by their team
- + Dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 networks, private DNS, OAuth, ACLs; SCIM/SIEM/traffic logs on Business
Cons
- - Very small vendor (single-digit headcount, ~$2.8M raised) behind a critical-path product
- - Pricing page mixes current per-connection rates with legacy platform/network fees and a $99/month plan — billing basis is ambiguous
- - Community tier is community-supported only; SLAs are Enterprise-only
- - Self-hosting the server adds operational overhead (upgrades, database, TLS, monitoring)
- - Native mobile meshing not supported — phones connect via gateway and the standard WireGuard app
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.