Supabase vs PlanetScale
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and PlanetScale.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Supabase
92 reviews
4.4/5
PlanetScale
357 reviews
PlanetScale is rated higher (4.4 vs 4.0). Supabase is a backend-as-a-service platform providing PostgreSQL databases, real-time subscriptions, authentication, and storage. Built for developers who want PostgreSQL's power without vendor lock-in. PlanetScale is serverless MySQL-compatible database with git-like branching, non-blocking schema changes, and auto-scaling. Used by companies serving billions of queries.
Supabase Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL | PlanetScale Serverless MySQL with database branching | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (92 reviews) | 4.4 (357 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams building web/mobile apps who prefer PostgreSQL's relational model and want to avoid vendor lock-in. | Teams running MySQL at scale who need schema migrations without downtime |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | 0 GB | 0 GB |
| Storage | 0 GB | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | 99.99%✓ |
| Data-center count | 12✓ | 6 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanySingaporeAustralia | United StatesEuropean Union |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi access |
| Visit Supabase → | Visit PlanetScale → | |
Supabase
Pros
- + Use standard PostgreSQL with full SQL support
- + Self-host or run on managed infrastructure
- + Real-time subscriptions with minimal latency
- + Built-in authentication and row-level security
- + Free tier sufficient for prototyping
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Firebase
- - Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge
- - Scaling to high concurrency requires manual tuning
PlanetScale
Pros
- + Non-blocking schema changes — no downtime migrations
- + Database branching like git
- + Auto-scales to handle traffic spikes
Cons
- - No foreign keys (Vitess architecture limitation)
- - Read replicas only on higher plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.