Skip to content

Supabase vs Pipedream

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Pipedream.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Supabase

0 reviews

4.1/5

Pipedream

0 reviews

Pipedream is rated higher (4.1 vs 4.0). Supabase is a backend-as-a-service platform providing PostgreSQL databases, real-time subscriptions, authentication, and storage. Built for developers who want PostgreSQL's power without vendor lock-in. Developer-first workflow automation with code steps (Node.js, Python, Go, Bash) over 2,500+ integrated apps and 10k+ triggers/actions. Credit-based pricing: Free plan at 300 credits/month, Basic $29/mo, Advanced $49/mo (annual). Now owned by Workday.

Supabase

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL

Pipedream

Pipedream

Low-code integration platform for developers

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.1 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium, credit-based usage (1 credit per 30s compute at 256 MB)
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams building web and mobile apps who want a relational backend — Postgres with auth, storage, realtime, and APIs — without operating infrastructure, and who value an open-source exit path.Developer teams automating integrations, webhooks, and AI-agent tooling who want managed auth and 2,500+ connectors instead of maintaining their own glue services
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM1 GB—
Storage1 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.9%—
Data-center count17—
€/GB RAM/mo€0.00—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing✓
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United States, Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Switzerland, Sweden, Brazil, India, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Australia
—
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source
free tierapi access
Visit Supabase →Visit Pipedream →

Supabase

Pros

  • + Real PostgreSQL with SQL, extensions, migrations, and row-level security — no schema lock-in
  • + Generous free tier: 50,000 MAU, 500MB database, unlimited API requests
  • + Bundled auth, realtime, S3-compatible storage, APIs, and edge functions on one platform
  • + Open source with a documented self-host path — a genuine exit if the managed service stops fitting
  • + Transparent, detailed pricing page and 17 AWS regions to place data close to users

Cons

  • - Bills grow legs: per-project compute, usage overages, and add-ons (PITR $100/mo per 7 days) stack up
  • - Uptime SLA (99.9%) is Enterprise-only; support SLAs need the $599/mo Team plan
  • - Free projects pause after a week of inactivity and skip automatic backups
  • - Auth, realtime, storage, and functions layers are Supabase-specific to migrate away from
  • - Scaling to high concurrency means moving to dedicated compute instances with sharp price steps
View full Supabasereview →

Pipedream

Pros

  • + Permanent free plan (300 credits/month, 3 active workflows, no credit card) with the full app library
  • + Real code steps with npm/PyPI, up to 10 GB RAM, 2 GB file system, no cold starts
  • + 2,500+ integrated apps with managed OAuth; Connect adds 3,000+ connectors and 10k+ tools for embedding
  • + Transparent credit metering (compute-time based) with documented limits and budget controls
  • + SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, GitHub sync with branch-based development, static egress IPs on Advanced

Cons

  • - Acquired by Workday (closed February 2026) — long-term product and pricing direction uncertain
  • - Credits burn fast on memory-heavy or fan-out workflows; production features gated behind the $49 plan
  • - No published uptime SLA or execution-region disclosure below enterprise contracts
  • - Proprietary workflow constructs — moving off Pipedream means rewriting the glue code
View full Pipedreamreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.