Supabase vs Azion
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and Azion.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Supabase
0 reviews
3.7/5
Azion
0 reviews
Supabase is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.7). Supabase is a backend-as-a-service platform providing PostgreSQL databases, real-time subscriptions, authentication, and storage. Built for developers who want PostgreSQL's power without vendor lock-in. Azion is a full edge computing platform with 100+ global PoPs. Edge Functions, Edge SQL, Edge Storage, and DDoS protection. Founded in Brazil with strong Latin American coverage.
Supabase Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL | Azion Edge platform with 100+ PoPs — Brazil-founded | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (0 reviews)✓ | 3.7 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams building web and mobile apps who want a relational backend — Postgres with auth, storage, realtime, and APIs — without operating infrastructure, and who value an open-source exit path. | LatAm-focused content, commerce, and API delivery teams wanting CDN + WAF + edge functions from one platform with published pricing |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | — |
| RAM | 1 GB | — |
| Storage | 1 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 17 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €0.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United States, Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Switzerland, Sweden, Brazil, India, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Australia | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Supabase → | Visit Azion → | |
Supabase
Pros
- + Real PostgreSQL with SQL, extensions, migrations, and row-level security — no schema lock-in
- + Generous free tier: 50,000 MAU, 500MB database, unlimited API requests
- + Bundled auth, realtime, S3-compatible storage, APIs, and edge functions on one platform
- + Open source with a documented self-host path — a genuine exit if the managed service stops fitting
- + Transparent, detailed pricing page and 17 AWS regions to place data close to users
Cons
- - Bills grow legs: per-project compute, usage overages, and add-ons (PITR $100/mo per 7 days) stack up
- - Uptime SLA (99.9%) is Enterprise-only; support SLAs need the $599/mo Team plan
- - Free projects pause after a week of inactivity and skip automatic backups
- - Auth, realtime, storage, and functions layers are Supabase-specific to migrate away from
- - Scaling to high concurrency means moving to dedicated compute instances with sharp price steps
Azion
Pros
- + Strong Latin American footprint — the network was built for Brazil/LatAm first
- + Full stack at the edge: CDN, edge functions, WAF, DDoS, DNS, object storage in one platform
- + Real free tier (Hobby) plus $300 credit for 365 days without a credit card
- + DDoS protection and Network Shield included with the Firewall at no extra charge
- + All on-demand per-metric prices published, with tiered volume discounts
Cons
- - Small community and thin third-party ecosystem versus Cloudflare
- - Fragmented pricing across many metrics and four regional tiers
- - JavaScript-only edge runtime; SQL/KV stores and AI inference are preview
- - SLA credits are capped (25% max) and require customer-run third-party monitoring
- - No VMs, bare metal, or rentable GPUs
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.