Skip to content

Supabase vs AWS Lambda

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Supabase and AWS Lambda.

Quick Verdict

4.0/5

Supabase

0 reviews

4.1/5

AWS Lambda

0 reviews

AWS Lambda is rated higher (4.1 vs 4.0). Supabase is a backend-as-a-service platform providing PostgreSQL databases, real-time subscriptions, authentication, and storage. Built for developers who want PostgreSQL's power without vendor lock-in. AWS Lambda is the original FaaS service — run code without servers. Supports 15+ runtimes, 1M free requests/month, and integrates deeply with 200+ AWS services. Triggered by S3, DynamoDB, API Gateway, and more.

Supabase

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative with PostgreSQL

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

The original serverless functions service

Overview
Rating4.0 (0 reviews)4.1 (0 reviews)✓
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium (pay per request + GB-second; MicroVMs/Managed Instances metered differently)
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams building web and mobile apps who want a relational backend — Postgres with auth, storage, realtime, and APIs — without operating infrastructure, and who value an open-source exit path.AWS developers building event-driven, variable-traffic workloads — webhooks, media processing, scheduled jobs, API backends — who want to stop managing servers entirely
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores——
RAM1 GB—
Storage1 GB—
Bandwidth——
SLA uptime99.9%99.95%✓
Data-center count17—
€/GB RAM/mo€0.00—
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection✓
Automated backups✓
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United States, Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Switzerland, Sweden, Brazil, India, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Australia
All 39 AWS regions / 124 AZs
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged options3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessopen source
free tierapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenter
Visit Supabase →Visit AWS Lambda →

Supabase

Pros

  • + Real PostgreSQL with SQL, extensions, migrations, and row-level security — no schema lock-in
  • + Generous free tier: 50,000 MAU, 500MB database, unlimited API requests
  • + Bundled auth, realtime, S3-compatible storage, APIs, and edge functions on one platform
  • + Open source with a documented self-host path — a genuine exit if the managed service stops fitting
  • + Transparent, detailed pricing page and 17 AWS regions to place data close to users

Cons

  • - Bills grow legs: per-project compute, usage overages, and add-ons (PITR $100/mo per 7 days) stack up
  • - Uptime SLA (99.9%) is Enterprise-only; support SLAs need the $599/mo Team plan
  • - Free projects pause after a week of inactivity and skip automatic backups
  • - Auth, realtime, storage, and functions layers are Supabase-specific to migrate away from
  • - Scaling to high concurrency means moving to dedicated compute instances with sharp price steps
View full Supabasereview →

AWS Lambda

Pros

  • + Zero idle cost with a free tier that covers small products: 1M requests and 400,000 GB-seconds monthly
  • + Graviton pricing at $0.0000133334 per GB-second undercuts x86 by roughly 20%
  • + Automatic multi-AZ scaling with a 99.95% per-region SLA and no capacity planning
  • + Deep event integration across AWS services, with three form factors (Event/Web Functions, MicroVMs)

Cons

  • - Per-request and GB-second pricing gets expensive against committed compute at steady high utilization
  • - Cold starts — hundreds of milliseconds to seconds depending on runtime — with provisioned concurrency as an extra meter
  • - 15-minute execution limit and payload caps make it wrong for long-running batch work
  • - AWS-specific event plumbing creates real lock-in; distributed event chains are hard to debug
View full AWS Lambdareview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.