Sucuri vs Cloudflare
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Sucuri and Cloudflare.
Quick Verdict
5.0/5
Sucuri
261 reviews
4.4/5
Cloudflare
122 reviews
Sucuri is rated higher (5.0 vs 4.4). Sucuri provides website firewall (cloud proxy WAF), DDoS protection, CDN, and website malware cleanup services. Popular for WordPress sites and small businesses needing website security. Cloudflare provides distributed content delivery, DDoS mitigation, and R2 object storage. Designed for developers and enterprises needing reliable infrastructure with minimal latency.
Sucuri Website firewall and malware cleanup service | Cloudflare Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 5.0 (261 reviews)✓ | 4.4 (122 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From €20/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | WordPress site owners who want a WAF plus professional malware cleanup if they get hacked | Teams building web applications requiring global distribution, DDoS protection, and cost-efficient object storage without egress fees. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 300 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Global — 300+ cities |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenter | free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider |
| Visit Sucuri → | Visit Cloudflare → | |
Sucuri
Pros
- + Includes malware cleanup service
- + WordPress-focused with good plugin integration
- + DDoS protection included
Cons
- - Slower CDN than Cloudflare
- - Not free — from $20/month
Cloudflare
Pros
- + Remove egress fees with R2 object storage pricing model
- + Deploy content globally with automatic edge caching
- + Mitigate DDoS attacks with Anycast network
- + Integrate security and performance in one platform
Cons
- - R2 has limited regional availability compared to AWS S3
- - Steeper learning curve for complex configuration options
- - Egress costs still apply for some traffic patterns outside R2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.