Strato vs HostMonster
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Strato and HostMonster.
Quick Verdict
3.3/5
Strato
0 reviews
2.5/5
HostMonster
0 reviews
Strato is rated higher (3.3 vs 2.5). German hosting provider founded 1997 in Berlin, part of United Internet's IONOS Group (Deutsche Telekom sold it in 2017). KVM VPS with NVMe and unmetered traffic from 4 euros/month, plus dedicated servers, managed servers, shared hosting, and HiDrive storage. Data centers in Germany. HostMonster no longer sells hosting; hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost. Existing accounts keep their servers and terms but log in at Bluehost. Founded 1996 in Provo, Utah.
Strato German VPS from a Deutsche Telekom subsidiary | HostMonster Legacy brand merged into Bluehost — no longer sold independently | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.3 (0 reviews)✓ | 2.5 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From $4/mo | Free tier available |
| Best for | German small businesses and self-hosters who want a German data center, German-speaking support, and a trusted mainstream brand for their VPS, and will pay a premium over budget hosts for it. | Existing HostMonster account holders deciding whether to stay through the Bluehost transition; not a viable choice for new signups |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 1 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 2 GB | — |
| Storage | 60 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | — | — |
| SLA uptime | — | — |
| Data-center count | — | — |
| €/vCPU/mo | €4.00 | — |
| €/GB RAM/mo | €2.00 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | Provo, Utah, US |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6backups includedeu datacentergdpr compliantwindows available | us datacenter |
| Visit Strato → | Visit HostMonster → | |
Strato
Pros
- + German data centers (ISO 27001 certified annually since 2004) — clean GDPR story
- + KVM with full root, NVMe storage, unmetered traffic on up to 1 Gbit/s
- + Long operating history since 1997 with 2M+ customer contracts
- + Broad ecosystem: domains, email, HiDrive storage, Acronis backup, managed servers
- + Rescue system, VNC console, upstream firewall, and basic monitoring included
Cons
- - Price-performance trails Hetzner and netcup at every tier (VPS M: 10 euros/mo)
- - Introductory prices (from 2 euros) jump 4–5x at renewal, plus a 9 euros setup fee
- - Backups not included and no snapshots on the VPS line; SLA is an optional paid add-on
- - German-first market: German-language docs and support, VAT-inclusive consumer pricing
- - No published CPU allocation policy (dedicated vs shared vCores) and no cloud-style API
HostMonster
Pros
- + Existing accounts are untouched: same servers, renewal dates, and billing cycles through the Bluehost transition
- + Long track record — the brand dates to 1996 in Provo, Utah
- + Classic budget feature set for legacy plans: cPanel, one-click WordPress, free domain and SSL
- + Backed by Newfold/Bluehost infrastructure and 24/7 support apparatus
Cons
- - No longer purchasable — hostmonster.com is a transition page into Bluehost
- - Consolidation risk: support, roadmap, and pricing decisions move to a portfolio owner
- - Legacy criticisms stand: renewal pricing above intro rates and bounded 'unlimited' claims
- - No published HostMonster SLA or spec sheets to verify claims today
- - New development and AI tooling land on Bluehost's product, not this brand
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.