Storj vs Backblaze B2
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Storj and Backblaze B2.
Storj Decentralized S3-compatible cloud storage | Backblaze B2 S3-compatible storage at a quarter of AWS S3 pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.8 (151 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (110 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Privacy-focused developers who want encrypted decentralized storage at below-AWS pricing | Developers and startups who need S3-compatible storage at the lowest possible price and don't require EU data residency |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United States |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleopen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access |
| Visit Storj → | Visit Backblaze B2 → | |
Storj
Pros
- + Decentralized — no single point of failure
- + $4/TB — cheaper than most competitors
- + E2E encryption by default
Cons
- - Decentralized model means variable performance
- - Less mature ecosystem than AWS S3
Backblaze B2
Pros
- + $6/TB/month — significantly cheaper than AWS S3
- + Free egress when paired with Cloudflare
- + S3-compatible API — drop-in replacement
Cons
- - US-only datacenters — no EU data residency option
- - No EU-based storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.