Statically vs Gcore
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Statically and Gcore.
Quick Verdict
3.4/5
Statically
0 reviews
3.8/5
Gcore
0 reviews
Gcore is rated higher (3.8 vs 3.4). Free CDN for static files from GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gist, and npm, plus an on-the-fly image optimization endpoint. No sign-up required; public repositories only, 25MB per file. Gcore is a Luxembourg-based CDN and cloud provider with 210+ PoPs and strong coverage in CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa.
Statically Global CDN for static assets with instant deployment and free tier | Gcore Global CDN with 210+ PoPs, strong CIS and emerging-market coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 (0 reviews) | 3.8 (0 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | free | pay-as-you-go |
| Starting price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best for | Open-source maintainers, hobby projects, and small sites that need to serve public Git or npm assets and images through a CDN at zero cost, without an uptime contract. | Applications whose audience spans CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and EU buyers wanting a Luxembourg legal base with predictable per-GB CDN pricing and a real free tier. |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tier | free tierddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Statically → | Visit Gcore → | |
Statically
Pros
- + Completely free with no sign-up — just rewrite the URL
- + Supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gist, and npm sources
- + Useful image endpoint: resize, WebP conversion, quality control
- + Delivery via bunny.net and Cloudflare, so edge reach is real
- + Assets stay in your own repository — zero lock-in if you leave
Cons
- - Public repositories only; no private content support
- - No SLA, no support contract, tiny donation-funded team
- - Undocumented bandwidth policy — the quoted '100GB free' figure is unverified
- - Rate limiting 'in cases of abuse' with no published thresholds
- - Undocumented, unpriced 'Pro' tier floating in the docs
Gcore
Pros
- + First 1 TB of CDN traffic free every month on the full 210+ PoP network, no card required
- + Published progressive per-GB pricing; overage rates cut ~66% versus the old Free tier
- + Strong CIS, Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa coverage where US rivals are thinner
- + Free SSL and basic L3/L4 DDoS included in every plan, not sold as add-ons
- + Cash-flow-positive company with reported ~$140M revenue — less pricing-risk than burn-rate challengers
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Cloudflare
- - WAF is a separate product with a basic self-serve tier; bot and API security are Enterprise
- - Stale pricing pages and inconsistent SLA figures (99% vs 99.9%) across channels
- - Brand less known in Western markets; more support-ticket-driven buying
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new hosting and infrastructure providers, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.